April 4, 2008
Johns Hopkins U. Health Database Blocks Searches for 'Abortion'
The “world’s largest database” on reproductive-health issues, run by Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health, has been blocking searches for the term “abortion” because of concerns over federal financing, according to Wired.
A librarian at the University of California at San Francisco became “puzzled” on Monday after running a routine search, and she then wrote to the database’s manager at Johns Hopkins to ask if the database had been changed. It has nearly 25,000 articles using the word.
“We recently made all abortion terms stop words,” the database’s manager, Debbie Dickson, replied in an e-mail message. “As a federally funded project, we decided this was best for now.”
The database receives money from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the federal agency whose mission is “extending a helping hand to those people overseas struggling to make a better life, recover from a disaster or striving to live in a free and democratic country.” Since 1973, the agency “has been legally prohibited from supporting or encouraging abortion as a method of family planning,” according to the agency’s Web site. —Catherine Rampell
Posted on Friday April 4, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Grad Student Creates a Hot-or-Not Bot
Next: Court Protects Students -- for Now -- in Battle With Music Industry
A statement from the Dean reads, in part:
“USAID, which funds POPLINE, found two items in the database related to abortion that did not fit POPLINE criteria. The agency then made an inquiry to POPLINE administrators. Following this inquiry, the POPLINE administrators at the Center for Communication Programs made the decision to restrict abortion as a search term.
I could not disagree more strongly with this decision, and I have directed that the POPLINE administrators restore “abortion” as a search term immediately. I will also launch an inquiry to determine why this change occurred.”
— NW Apr 4, 05:04 PM #
This is another example of the frightening trend of government intrusion into the academy. This censorship is outrageous.
— PW Apr 6, 07:26 PM #
To PW, if institutions take the funding, they accept the strings. (btw, I have no position on the issue)
— RC Apr 7, 07:38 AM #
This is so disturbing, I don’t know what to say.
— Anonymous Apr 7, 10:49 AM #
maybe they should change the name to Jerry Fallwell University
— mk Apr 7, 12:49 PM #