March 28, 2008
A Hostage Incident at U. of Louisville Provides Lessons in Emergency Response
Less than a half an hour after police at the U. of Louisville discovered that a woman was holding someone hostage at a university health center yesterday, officials sent a notification to students, professors, and staff members by e-mail, text message, and telephone.
It was one of the first times the university had used its text-messaging system, which it installed in October, and officials say that they learned at least one important lesson: make your message as crystal clear as possible.
The message read: “There is a student armed with a weapon at Student Health Services on Belknap Campus. Please avoid the area. THIS IS NOT A TEST”
Dennis K. Sullivan, assistant director of environmental health and safety at the university, said some people on the medical campus at first believed that the incident was taking place there. The medical campus, which also has a health center, is located a few miles away from the main campus, where the trouble occurred.
“In hindsight it should have read ‘Belknap campus health services center’” so that the location was clearer, said Mr. Sullivan.
Officials had prepared a variety of messages for various types of events, but none of those scripts fit the situation that unfolded yesterday. “The one event that does occur is the one that you don’t have an e-mail message scripted for,” he said. The university’s emergency-response procedures are published online.
The text-messaging system used by the campus — made by Rave Wireless — worked well, Mr. Sullivan said. Officials of the company said that messages were delivered to all 5,689 users registered for the service in just 64 seconds, and that 97 percent of the users had valid cellphone numbers in the system.
Mr. Sullivan said he would like to get more of the 27,000 eligible people on the campus to sign up for the alert system.
“We’ve had drawings for iPods, we’ve given away radios, we’ve done a lot of things to promote it,” he said. The incident has led about 500 more people to sign up for the system since yesterday’s alert was sent. “I’d be really satisfied if we get 20,000 people.” —Jeffrey R. Young
Posted on Friday March 28, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Wake Forest Librarian to Be Honored for Sociology-Course Contributions
Next: More (Unintentionally) Funny Student E-Mail Messages to Professors
and some companies are making big money out of it… Have we actually evaluated the reactions of students? One of the reasons why fire dept got rid of sirens and switched to beepers in the 1980s was that the alert drew crowds to the fire stations, curious to see what was happening. If I were a student, I would rush to the health centre to see what was happening.
I’m also rather sceptical about the ‘less than half an hour’. This tells me the systems only work when you have a very slow gunman…
— peter Mar 29, 01:45 PM #
I don’t know about others, but few of our students would rush to an incident where it was reported that weapons were involved.
Realities have imposed such a system upon us. It isn’t the speed of the gunman (person?) but the reduction in potential targets which is one important goal.
— james Mar 31, 09:29 AM #
Peter, please feel free to rush to the health center. In the words of Erik Idle, “Are you completely and totally deranged?”
— Eric Mar 31, 12:56 PM #
Being a member of emergency services for over 15 years now, the one thing I have learned to be absoulute, is that there is always at least one moron who rushes to the scene that has absolutely no business doing so. This is going to occur regardless of how they find out about the incident. At least with timely notification, those who God did bless with common sense can avoid the dangers. Of course, timely notification certainly isn’t thirty minutes later!
— Scott Mar 31, 01:04 PM #
One interesting question is how long it took for students to actually receive the notification. Some places are finding that the technology takes as much as an hour to grind through the process to send the text messages.
— Geoffrey Nathan Mar 31, 02:45 PM #