The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all.
— Debbie C

Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors

Recent Posts

Another Giuliani Finds His Dream Deferred

Bible Professor Will Leave Seminary Instead of Facing Hearing

Purdue U. Scientist Appeals Findings of Research Misconduct

Embattled Congressman Calls for Investigation Into His Actions on Behalf of CCNY

Baylor U. Regents Fire President, Citing Failure to Unite Campus


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104

Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92

Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59

College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54

Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

June 28, 2006

British Group Retreats From Requiring Open Access to Research

A year after releasing a draft policy on open access, the umbrella organization of Britain’s publicly financed research councils has softened its stance. The group, Research Councils UK, originally called for free access to papers resulting from research it financed “at the earliest opportunity” (The Chronicle, June 29, 2005). But now, in a new policy statement released today, the group will allow each of the eight member councils to formulate its own policy.

Thus far, only one research council—the Medical Research Council—requires free access, according to the blog of a leading open-access advocate, Peter Suber, who is director of the Open Access Project at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group in Washington.

Nonetheless, the updated policy statement continues to support open access and asserts that “ideas and knowledge derived from publicly funded research must be made available and accessible for public use, interrogation, and scrutiny, as widely, rapidly, and effectively as possible.”

The open-access movement in the United States also seems to be evolving in fits and starts (The Chronicle, May 11).

Posted on Wednesday June 28, 2006 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. An unintentional omission in yesterday’s blog item: Along with the Medical Research Council, the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council also requires open access. Mr. Suber has also updated his blog to reflect that fact.

    — Lila Guterman    Jun 29, 05:46 PM    #