|
|
In the Comments
"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all. Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors
Recent Posts
Another Giuliani Finds His Dream Deferred Andrew Giuliani, son of the former New York mayor and Republican presidential candidate, has sued Duke University for kicking him off its golf team. Bible Professor Will Leave Seminary Instead of Facing Hearing The faculty member wrote a book expressing the view that human beings shaped the Bible, an idea deemed contrary to the conservative seminary’s faculty oath. Comment [13] Purdue U. Scientist Appeals Findings of Research Misconduct Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, a nuclear engineer, challenged a university panel that said he had misled other scientists about his research into nuclear fusion. Embattled Congressman Calls for Investigation Into His Actions on Behalf of CCNY Rep. Charles Rangel used Congressional letterhead to seek donations for an academic center bearing his name. Comment [8] Baylor U. Regents Fire President, Citing Failure to Unite Campus John M. Lilley, the university’s president since November 2005, had been at the center of several recent controversies. Comment [12]
Most Commented This Month
Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104 Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92 Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59 College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54 Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search June 28, 2006British Group Retreats From Requiring Open Access to ResearchA year after releasing a draft policy on open access, the umbrella organization of Britain’s publicly financed research councils has softened its stance. The group, Research Councils UK, originally called for free access to papers resulting from research it financed “at the earliest opportunity” (The Chronicle, June 29, 2005). But now, in a new policy statement released today, the group will allow each of the eight member councils to formulate its own policy. Thus far, only one research council—the Medical Research Council—requires free access, according to the blog of a leading open-access advocate, Peter Suber, who is director of the Open Access Project at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group in Washington. Nonetheless, the updated policy statement continues to support open access and asserts that “ideas and knowledge derived from publicly funded research must be made available and accessible for public use, interrogation, and scrutiny, as widely, rapidly, and effectively as possible.” The open-access movement in the United States also seems to be evolving in fits and starts (The Chronicle, May 11). Posted on Wednesday June 28, 2006 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Audit Suggests That Florida A&M U. May Be Putting Fiscal House in Order
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
An unintentional omission in yesterday’s blog item: Along with the Medical Research Council, the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council also requires open access. Mr. Suber has also updated his blog to reflect that fact.
— Lila Guterman Jun 29, 05:46 PM #