|
|
In the Comments
"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering." NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams
Recent Posts
U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges In a statement released today by the university, Stephen G. Jennings acknowledged making “a very serious mistake” and apologized. Comment [4] Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action The backers of a similar measure in Colorado filed petitions months ago, but legal challenges may complicate such campaigns. Comment [19] Oklahoma's Matching-Gift Backlog Booms Despite Moratorium Instead of helping to clear a $225-million backlog of matching-gift obligations, a July 1 moratorium on the program has set back the state even more. Italian-American Groups Rally to Save Advanced Placement Test in Italian The Italian ambassador to the United States is leading efforts to raise money to continue the examination. Comment [3] U. of Chicago Students Scramble After Lender Pulls Out The Illinois Student Assistance Commission is ending its “school as lender” arrangement with the university. Comment [2]
Most Commented This Month
Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88 ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77 Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61 U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49 Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search June 6, 2006Open-Access Publisher to Start Major Multidisciplinary JournalThe Public Library of Science, a major publisher of open-access journals, unveiled its latest project today: PLoS ONE, an online journal of general science. The journal, once it is officially started this year, will concentrate on speedy peer review and publishing, as well as links from published papers to online debates. “PLoS ONE,” its Web site says, “will empower the scientific community to engage in a discussion on every paper and provide readers with tools to annotate and comment on papers directly.” But when reached by telephone, the Public Library of Science’s communications manager declined to comment on the initiative, saying a formal announcement would come shortly. Peter Suber, director of the Open Access Project at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group in Washington, was the first to publicize the new project, on his open-access blog. He discovered PLoS ONE during his usual morning search of the Web for news about open access. The PLoS move raised suspicions that the open-access publisher could begin to compete with leading multidisciplinary journals like Science and Nature. On Monday, Nature announced an online experiment that would allow signed comments to be appended to papers under review—perhaps anticipating PLoS’s encroachment into its territory by striking out into new online territory of its own (The Chronicle, June 6). Mr. Suber told The Chronicle today that he applauds the experiment by Nature, whether the journal is doing it out of its own curiosity or because it recognizes an interest among its users and competitors. “It seems like a smart move,” he said. Posted on Tuesday June 6, 2006 | Permalink |
Previous: Another College Chooses to Make SAT Optional for Applicants
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||