The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member

Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette

Bedbugs 1, Charity 0

Water-Main Break Damages Library at University in St. Louis


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

September 24, 2008

Fresh Delay for National Research Council's Doctoral Assessments

The long wait for the National Research Council’s assessments and rankings of American doctoral programs just got a bit longer.

The council posted a notice on Wednesday indicating that its report — which had been scheduled for a late-September or early-October release — had been postponed again. This is the latest in a long series of calendar shuffles for the assessments, which have not been updated since a 1995 report.

The notice says that the project’s “methodology guide” — a preliminary report that will summarize the statistical techniques used in the new assessments — will be released in late October or early November. But no date has been set for the release of the assessments themselves.

Among the reasons for this year’s delays was a late decision to expand the range of publications that would be included when counting citations of faculty members’ scholarly work. That decision required a time-consuming analysis of a database provided by the Thomson Corporation.

The project’s director, Charlotte V. Kuh, offered a status report on the assessments during a July workshop sponsored by the Council of Graduate Schools. —David Glenn

Posted on Wednesday September 24, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. …still trying to jimmie the numbers so the Ivies win!

    — Miles Fornier    Sep 25, 11:35 AM    #

  2. I doubt that. But this is like Waiting for Godot. It’s getting absurdist. Much like the 10-year wait for the reporting methods under the “new” (1997) race/ethnic standards. For nearly a decade Dept of Ed. said they would be released “very soon.” On and on ….

    — DDVA    Sep 29, 09:47 AM    #