The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member

Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette

Bedbugs 1, Charity 0

Water-Main Break Damages Library at University in St. Louis


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

July 16, 2008

Psychological Association Is Rethinking Policy on Open-Access Archiving

The American Psychological Association appears to be retreating from a new policy on open-access archiving that drew sharp criticism after it was described on Tuesday by The Chronicle.

On this News Blog and elsewhere online critics said the association’s plan to charge authors $2,500 each to post their published articles on a free online database was, at best, “regressive” and, at worst, the work of “cash-flow hounds” in the group’s “money-making machine.” (At least one prominent open-access advocate defended the policy.)

Today the policy that was posted online yesterday has been replaced with a statement that the policy is being “re-examined.”

Yesterday the same link went to a statement saying that the psychological association would charge $2,500 to authors who must archive in PubMed Central, the repository of papers published by researchers with grants from the National Institutes of Health, and would archive their manuscripts for them. —Lila Guterman

Update, 4:45 p.m.: Rhea Farberman, the association’s director of communications, told The Chronicle that the group was considering the fee to recoup licensing and subscription revenue lost because of open access. Thanks to open access, she said, “all publishers are forced to look at how to cover the costs of such things as peer review and publishing, editorial work, production work, paper, ink, all those things.”

Posted on Wednesday July 16, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Every publisher is in the same boat. Why should the APA use this as a way to profit? The AACR deposits for free 1 year after publication. Take a cue from them.

    — Beverly Barton    Jul 17, 12:46 PM    #