The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Many, many years ago one of my English TA officemates noticed that a student wrote 'writhing' instead of 'writing.' We spent the rest of the afternoon inserting 'writhing' into textbook titles ('Writhing with a Purpose') and other phrases like 'technical writhing.' My favorite: 'writhing across the curriculum.'” --peg

Herding the 'Escape Goats': Contest Sends Up Epidemic of Student Howlers

Recent Posts

Palin Attended 4 Colleges in 5 Years to Earn Diploma

California Budget Impasse Delays Grants for Community-College Students

Cutthroat Competition for Textbook Sales Pits UMass Faculty Members Against Bookstore

Private Universities Expand Their Reach Worldwide, British Report Says

Penn State Professor Dies After Collapsing in Class


Most Commented This Month

Professor Suspects UCLA Is Illegally Using Race in Admissions Decisions | 40

Cutthroat Competition for Textbook Sales Pits UMass Faculty Members Against Bookstore | 29

British Publisher Will Release Controversial Novel About Muhammad's Bride | 17

Palin Attended 4 Colleges in 5 Years to Earn Diploma | 17

Sami Al-Arian Is Out of Jail for First Time in 5 Years | 17

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

July 16, 2008

Psychological Association Is Rethinking Policy on Open-Access Archiving

The American Psychological Association appears to be retreating from a new policy on open-access archiving that drew sharp criticism after it was described on Tuesday by The Chronicle.

On this News Blog and elsewhere online critics said the association’s plan to charge authors $2,500 each to post their published articles on a free online database was, at best, “regressive” and, at worst, the work of “cash-flow hounds” in the group’s “money-making machine.” (At least one prominent open-access advocate defended the policy.)

Today the policy that was posted online yesterday has been replaced with a statement that the policy is being “re-examined.”

Yesterday the same link went to a statement saying that the psychological association would charge $2,500 to authors who must archive in PubMed Central, the repository of papers published by researchers with grants from the National Institutes of Health, and would archive their manuscripts for them. —Lila Guterman

Update, 4:45 p.m.: Rhea Farberman, the association’s director of communications, told The Chronicle that the group was considering the fee to recoup licensing and subscription revenue lost because of open access. Thanks to open access, she said, “all publishers are forced to look at how to cover the costs of such things as peer review and publishing, editorial work, production work, paper, ink, all those things.”

Posted on Wednesday July 16, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. So, yesterday we all lamented that the fee was all about the APA making money. The updated story seems to suggest that, instead, it’s all about the APA making money. I either stand corrected, confirmed, or confused.

    — Jon    Jul 17, 12:28 PM    #

  2. Every publisher is in the same boat. Why should the APA use this as a way to profit? The AACR deposits for free 1 year after publication. Take a cue from them.

    — Beverly Barton    Jul 17, 12:46 PM    #