The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

June 23, 2008

Web Site That Gave Students Improper Help on GMAT Is Hit With $2.3-Million Penalty

The Graduate Management Admission Council has been awarded $2.3-million in damages in a copyright-infringement lawsuit against the operator of a Web site that posted real questions and unauthorized study materials to help students pass the council’s business-school entrance examination, the GMAT, the council announced on Friday.

Students who used the site, ScoreTop.com, to try to improve their scores on the Graduate Management Admission Test may regret it. The council has seized a hard drive from a server used to run the Web site, and says it will notify business schools of anyone who violated its testing policies by using the site. The council, which administers the admission test, will also cancel those students’ scores.

Students looking for the Web site today instead read the following: “Warning! If You Are Looking for ‘Real’ GMAT® Exam Questions, Think Again!” A series of threats against cheaters followed. That set off a flurry of panicked e-mail messages and blog entries.

More than 4,000 graduate business and management programs worldwide use the GMAT to assess the qualifications of M.B.A. candidates.

The council was given control of the Web site by a U.S. District Court in Virginia, which also ruled that Lei Shi and other operators of the site must pay the council legal fees, court costs, and other relief. The council sued Mr. Shi, who was living in the United States at the time but has since returned to his native China, for distributing copyrighted GMAT-related materials through the site without the council’s permission. —Katherine Mangan

Posted on Monday June 23, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. How would the students that used the website know they were violating testing policies by using the site? If schools do try and dismiss students that used the site, this will be a field day for attorneys.

    — Kyle David    Jun 23, 05:25 PM    #

  2. How much of a field day the lawyers have will depend on the wording of the GMAT registration materials in the section on test security and cancellation of test scores. Generally, testing companies have reserved somewhat broad rights to cancel scores they believe are not valid. I, unfortunately, was unable to find a copy of the registraiton on-line, but GMAT attorneys may have drafted around the problem to begin with.

    — EAC    Jun 24, 09:15 AM    #

  3. GMAT are rewarded copywrite infringement demage, but what happens to those 4000 users? They were not notified about the scam earlier. They should file a lawsuit against the SCORETOP.COM company for false advertising.
    I wonder what will the Chinese think of next? First the defected dolls, toys,then the plagarism in research materials and now university entrance examinations????

    — Doris Martin    Jun 30, 04:04 AM    #