The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member

Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette

Bedbugs 1, Charity 0


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

June 20, 2008

Spending Bill Would Provide $400-Million Extra for Science Research and Education

Washington — Congress is nearing approval of a spending bill that would provide $400-million in new money for scientific research this year and reverse all layoffs at federal energy laboratories, ensuring continued access by academic scientists for their studies.

In addition, the measure would triple spending this year for a program, the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarships, that trains undergraduates to teach mathematics and science in schools.

The bill, which would also expand tuition benefits for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is part of a larger measure to finance those military operations. The House of Representatives approved it on Thursday night.

Of the $400-million for science, $62.5-million would go to the Department of Energy’s Office of Science to avoid the termination of government researchers and technicians at the agency’s facilities, such as the Fermilab National Acceleratory Laboratory, in Illinois, where 59 workers have already accepted severance packages. University officials had lobbied to prevent those cutbacks, arguing that they would damage academic studies conducted there.

As for the remaining money, $150-million would go to the National Institutes of Health and $62.5-million each would go to the National Science Foundation and NASA. The spending would be allocated for the 2008 fiscal year, which ends in September.

Of the NSF’s share, $20-million would be set aside for the agency’s Noyce scholarship program, which helps pay college costs for undergraduates who agree to teach math and science after earning their degrees. The program’s budget is only $11-million this year, although Congress has authorized it to receive up to $115-million.

Still, each share of the $400-million represents a small fraction of each agency’s budget. And even with the increases, all of the agencies’ budgets would not keep pace with inflation this year.

Nevertheless, the spending proposal was welcome news not only to physicists but also to other scientists who have been chafing under tight budgets at federal science agencies in recent years. University officials and some lawmakers had complained that Congress was reneging on promises made in the America Competes Act, a law enacted last year that authorized big increases in federal spending on the physical sciences and on science education to enhance America’s global economic competitiveness.

The Senate is expected to vote next week on the spending measure for this year, called a supplemental appropriations bill, and President Bush has said he will sign it. —Jeffrey Brainard

Posted on Friday June 20, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. It is pathetic that this is the best we can do as a society to fund research in science and technology.

    — SL    Jun 20, 10:08 PM    #

  2. In response to SL in comment 1, I long to see the day when the academic community says, “No, we don’t need an increase in public funding this year. We have all the money we need.” Or, even better, I would love to hear them say, “Our research is so promising and so worthwhile that venture capitalists are lining up to provide funding.”

    Until then, I won’t take SL’s comments about “pathetic” government funding too seriously.

    — J. Ward    Jun 23, 04:04 PM    #

  3. Alas, the venture capitalists have no interest in funding unproven technologies or the years of basic and applied research that go into developing them. They prefer to reduce their risk because, guess what, they are trying to make money, not contribute to the public good.

    And I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the academic community to turn away funding. Thankfully, we still have researchers who have more good ideas than funds to pursue them.

    — mlp    Jun 23, 05:05 PM    #

  4. …“different data sources generally include different activities in ‘research and development’”…

    As an FYI to what S. Britchky wrote, data on the conduct of research and development in the U.S. come from the National Science Foundation. That is, Battelle researchers, the editors of R&D Magazine, and other sources of R&D data all use NSF numbers as the basis for their projections. NSF data and information on how they are collected (survey questionnaires, definitions, etc.) can be found by going to the NSF Website at www.nsf.gov and clicking on “statistics.”

    — AnNSFemployee    Jun 24, 02:04 PM    #