The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

May 31, 2008

President Bush Says Congress Has More Work to Do on New GI Bill

Washington — In his weekly Saturday radio address, President Bush upbraided members of Congress for failing to act on, among other things, legislation to aid military veterans, the Associated Press reported.

But the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly approved legislation last week that would significantly expand veterans’ tuition benefits while providing billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill awaits action in the House, where the president has enough Republican support to sustain a veto. In his address, the president said Congress should pass a bill to pay for the wars that is not “loaded up” with unrelated domestic spending.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reacted to the message by saying Congress wanted to “launch a new GI Bill for a full, four-year education for the veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.” The administration opposes the Senate bill because it would give the college benefits to veterans with three years of service, which, it says, would discourage them from re-enlisting. —Heidi Landecker

Posted on Saturday May 31, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Our politicians need to take the POLITICS out of helping American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines. I used my GI Bill benefits to get through a doctoral program but had to supplement it significantly w/ my own funds. The original GI Bill turned around this country after WWII. Let’s get this new one approved so that returning veterans can reap the benefits of a quality education. HOOAH!

    — Tom G.    Jun 2, 07:51 AM    #

  2. Let me get this straight: It’s OK for taxpayers to fork over billions that continue to be unaccounted for, but Bush balks when American troops need help? And I believe he spoke about civic duty this weekend at West Point. What a joke.

    — Eric    Jun 2, 08:56 AM    #

  3. This administration has failed to ramp up medical support and VA benefits for veterans at the same time they were creating huge numbers of wounded soldiers by continuing the war. They continue to spend huge amounts of the nation’s money on the war, but balk at providing badly needed GI Bill and medical benefits, saying those items are too expensive. This is a national disgrace and indictment of the Bush administration!! They need to ramp up spending on their soldiers and ramp down their spending on the war. The Bush position absolutely defines hypocrisy.

    — Al    Jun 2, 12:04 PM    #

  4. It is heartening to read that people understand that there is a difference between supporting the war and supporting the troops. Funding the GI bill will bring some dignity to the sacrifices our troops have been asked to make for our country. Funding education and healthcare for them is the very least we as a country can do to show our appreciate and thanks. Shame on Bush, and shame on the senate and legislature for not seeing past the politics…and their own back-sides.

    — Marie Nubia-Feliciano, M.S.    Jun 2, 04:18 PM    #