The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"What’s the big deal? I always require 200 M&Ms with the blue ones picked out and 7 bottles of Evian with the caps loosened. Seems like pretty much the same thing."
— PLW

Professor Who Flew to Deliver Guest Lecture Bills Stanford for Carbon Offset of Travel

Recent Posts

Disabled Students Remain Eligible for Federally Subsidized Housing

Leaked Contract Helps Sallie Mae and USA Funds in Court

Professor Who Flew to Deliver Guest Lecture Bills Stanford for Carbon Offset of Travel

Merger of 2 Food-Science Programs Crosses State Lines

FBI Investigates Ponzi Scheme Allegedly Conducted at U. of Miami


Most Commented This Month

New Mexico State U. Threatens to Revoke Fired Professors' Degrees | 69

Drinking-Age Campaign Binges on Big Names, Big Media | 62

All U. of Iowa Professors Told to Undergo Training to Avoid Sexual Harassment | 50

Withhold 'Judgement' on Students When a Word is 'Misspelt' | 50

U. of San Diego Backtracks on Appointing Feminist Catholic Theologian | 48

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

May 22, 2008

Senate Passes Bill on Veterans' Tuition Benefits by Veto-Proof Margin

Washington — The U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly today to pass a pair of amendments that would significantly expand veterans’ tuition benefits while providing billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The package now heads back to the U.S. House of Representatives, which passed the tuition-benefits measure last week but rejected the war-funds legislation. If the House agrees to the Senate’s war-spending level, the bill will go to President Bush for his veto or signature. If the House does not agree, lawmakers will have to convene a conference committee to negotiate a compromise first.

Either way, lawmakers will have to figure out how to pay for the tuition benefits. The House, which is bound by “pay as you go” rules requiring all new spending to be offset with cuts, has approved a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans. But several senators oppose that plan, so lawmakers may need to find another offset.

There are other potential hurdles as well. President Bush has threatened to veto any spending bill that exceeds his $108-billion cap. Today’s votes in the Senate were large enough to override such a veto, but it’s unclear if the House’s margin will remain large enough once war spending is added to the package.

If the bill is ultimately signed into law, veterans who have served in the military for at least three years since September 11, 2001, would receive tuition aid up to the cost of attending the most-expensive public college in their state, plus a monthly stipend for housing costs. —Kelly Field

Posted on Thursday May 22, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Three cheers for lawmakers championing this bill!

    — UTK Alum    May 22, 03:53 PM    #

  2. The Senate has shown their support of those brave citizens in uniform that the other 99% of the population appreciates their sacrifice.

    — Jim USAR Ret    May 22, 04:08 PM    #

  3. remember McCain is against this veterans’ bill

    — jake    May 22, 04:27 PM    #

  4. McCain is against this bill because he very sensibly understands that it is going to bankrupt the military budget if it passes into law.

    Part of being a leader is sometimes having the guts to say NO when the nation can’t afford something. We can’t say YES to everything.

    Wake up!!!!

    Signed: Sister and grand daughter of veterans…

    — NYMOM    May 23, 09:03 AM    #

  5. Bailouts, tax cuts for the wealthiest and corporations, colossal waste by for-profit contractors in Iraq and New Orleans, and … the Iraq war itself … and this expenditure is going to bankrupt us?

    — swish    May 23, 10:31 AM    #

  6. McCain needs to say “No” to continuing this war which is bankrupting the country. Then there would be funds available to support tuition for veterans.

    — David    May 23, 10:47 AM    #

  7. I teach online courses in which approx. 95% of my students are active duty military. Many of them are stationed overseas in Iraq, Afghanistan, or other places that they won’t divulge. These individuals look forward to communications with their classmates around the world as a way to stay connected with any sense of normalcy.

    These students also rightfully realize that they will pursue other careers after their time in the military has ended.

    If support for these individuals’ education is threatened, then I would suggest that we need to re-examine our ethical and financial priorities.

    — Dr. J    May 23, 11:05 AM    #