 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna
Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges
Speaking at a Unesco conference in Paris, the vice president’s wife stressed the importance of two-year institutions to the nation’s educational goals.
Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement
Administrators are scrambling to plug holes in their course schedules for fall, with most expecting to do so by hiring more adjuncts or increasing class sizes.
U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show
The two were among five with houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities.
New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role
Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois.
Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member
The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said.
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58
President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58
Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57
Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57
North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty
Prior days' news: By date | Search
This week's print issue
Back issues: By date | Search
May 22, 2008
Senate Passes Bill on Veterans' Tuition Benefits by Veto-Proof Margin
Washington — The U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly today to pass a pair of amendments that would significantly expand veterans’ tuition benefits while providing billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The package now heads back to the U.S. House of Representatives, which passed the tuition-benefits measure last week but rejected the war-funds legislation. If the House agrees to the Senate’s war-spending level, the bill will go to President Bush for his veto or signature. If the House does not agree, lawmakers will have to convene a conference committee to negotiate a compromise first.
Either way, lawmakers will have to figure out how to pay for the tuition benefits. The House, which is bound by “pay as you go” rules requiring all new spending to be offset with cuts, has approved a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans. But several senators oppose that plan, so lawmakers may need to find another offset.
There are other potential hurdles as well. President Bush has threatened to veto any spending bill that exceeds his $108-billion cap. Today’s votes in the Senate were large enough to override such a veto, but it’s unclear if the House’s margin will remain large enough once war spending is added to the package.
If the bill is ultimately signed into law, veterans who have served in the military for at least three years since September 11, 2001, would receive tuition aid up to the cost of attending the most-expensive public college in their state, plus a monthly stipend for housing costs. —Kelly Field
Posted on Thursday May 22, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: GRE to Include a New Component on Skills, Not Just Aptitude
Next: Complaints Force Company to Retreat From Selling Scholarly Papers Online
The Senate has shown their support of those brave citizens in uniform that the other 99% of the population appreciates their sacrifice.
— Jim USAR Ret May 22, 04:08 PM #
remember McCain is against this veterans’ bill
— jake May 22, 04:27 PM #
McCain is against this bill because he very sensibly understands that it is going to bankrupt the military budget if it passes into law.
Part of being a leader is sometimes having the guts to say NO when the nation can’t afford something. We can’t say YES to everything.
Wake up!!!!
Signed: Sister and grand daughter of veterans…
— NYMOM May 23, 09:03 AM #
Bailouts, tax cuts for the wealthiest and corporations, colossal waste by for-profit contractors in Iraq and New Orleans, and … the Iraq war itself … and this expenditure is going to bankrupt us?
— swish May 23, 10:31 AM #
McCain needs to say “No” to continuing this war which is bankrupting the country. Then there would be funds available to support tuition for veterans.
— David May 23, 10:47 AM #
I teach online courses in which approx. 95% of my students are active duty military. Many of them are stationed overseas in Iraq, Afghanistan, or other places that they won’t divulge. These individuals look forward to communications with their classmates around the world as a way to stay connected with any sense of normalcy.
These students also rightfully realize that they will pursue other careers after their time in the military has ended.
If support for these individuals’ education is threatened, then I would suggest that we need to re-examine our ethical and financial priorities.
— Dr. J May 23, 11:05 AM #