The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all.
— Debbie C

Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors

Recent Posts

Bible Professor Will Leave Seminary Instead of Facing Hearing

Purdue U. Scientist Appeals Findings of Research Misconduct

Embattled Congressman Calls for Investigation Into His Actions on Behalf of CCNY

Baylor U. Regents Fire President, Citing Failure to Unite Campus

U. of Texas Investment Directors Vote to Repeal Ethics Rule


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104

Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92

Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59

College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54

Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

May 16, 2008

Senate Bill Supports Veterans' Benefits and $1.2-Billion for Science

Washington — The U.S. Senate’s Appropriations Committee voted on Thursday to increase spending for biomedical and physical-sciences research by $1.2-billion for the remainder of 2008 and expand tuition benefits for veterans.

The money was contained in a bill to finance the Iraq war. The veterans’ benefits are identical to those in the version of the bill approved on Thursday by the House of Representatives. Unlike the House, however, the Senate committee did not offset the cost of the tuition benefits — $52-billion over 10 years — with a tax increase on wealthy individuals. (It’s unclear whether that offset, which is required under House rules, would survive a vote in the full Senate, where several lawmakers oppose a tax increase.)

For scientific research, the Senate bill would reportedly add $400-million each for the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy and $200-million each for the National Science Foundation and NASA. Universities have lobbied for an increase because last December Congress provided minimal increases for research at all of those agencies in the regular appropriations bill for the 2008 fiscal year, which ends in September.

But unlike the Senate panel, the House committee added no money for science in the measure. President Bush has already vowed to veto the bill if it contains nondefense spending, and Congress’s Democratic leaders may be hard-pressed to persuade enough Republicans to help them override a veto. —Jeffrey Brainard and Kelly Field

Posted on Friday May 16, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. It doesn’t matter, Dubya’s gonna veto it. This was a freebie take it back to the constituents “I’m for the troops” for all Congress wienees.

    — Good ol' Bubba    May 16, 04:21 PM    #