|
|
In the Comments
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Recent Posts
Nevada Regents Vote Out UNLV President After 8-Hour Public Grilling David B. Ashley contended that the regents had focused on issues irrelevant to his performance as president. California's Public Universities to Cut Salaries and Enrollment in Budget Crunch The University of California and California State University systems released budget plans this week in the expectation of the largest cut in state support in several decades. Comment [3] Key Republican Says 'Fight Is Not Over' on Student Loans Republicans haven’t given up hope on saving the bank-based guaranteed-loan program, Rep. John Kline of Minnesota said today. Domestic National Guard Members Are Left Out of Expanded GI Bill More than 75,000 members who were not deployed overseas will not be eligible for benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill unless Congress passes corrective legislation. National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Names Interim President Joan Crissman, the group’s executive vice president, will serve while Philip R. Day is facing criminal charges. Comment [1]
Most Commented This Month
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58 President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58 Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57 Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57 North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search May 15, 2008Medical School for Physician-Scientists Will Offer Free TuitionThe Cleveland Clinic’s medical school will offer full-tuition scholarships to all of its students in an effort to encourage more people to pursue careers in academic medicine, the clinic announced today. The free-tuition offer, which will begin with the class that enters in July, will initially be supported through endowment income and clinical revenues. The clinic hopes eventually to pay for it entirely through endowment income. Students will still pay about $22,000 a year for living expenses, fees, books, and equipment. “The average debt for students graduating from private U.S. medical schools, such as the Lerner College of Medicine, is more than $150,000, making many graduates less likely to pursue careers in academic medicine,” said Delos M. (Toby) Cosgrove, president of the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western University. “By providing full-tuition support, we want to ensure that debt does not hinder the ability of our graduates to pursue academic careers as physician scientists.” In 2002 the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Case Western Reserve University announced that they were opening a new medical school to train physicians and scientists for clinical-research careers. The school accepted its first students in 2004. —Katherine Mangan Posted on Thursday May 15, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Study Finds Varying Community-College Enrollments Among States
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Many medical schools are promoting MD-PhD programs to train “physician-scientists” in the hopes that graduates will pursue medical research in academic medicine settings. However, it’s commonly believed that most of these graduates never enter biomedical research, opting instead to go into clinical practice where they can make considerably more money. Is anyone aware of data that show: (1) the proportion of MD-PhDs that actually become researchers and (2) the impact or contributions of MD-PhD’s compared to “mere” PhDs? As you can probably tell from my comment and question, I suspect that the cost of these programs doesn’t justify the outcomes.
— murphyd May 16, 11:40 AM #
I agree. I’m a physician who also went to grad school. MD-PhDs do not get rigorous training in scientific studies or statistical analysis of data, and their research is usually limited. It is not equivalent to regular PhD training programs. Any review of medical journals can reveal the often shoddy statistical analysis.
— Linda May 16, 12:17 PM #
The larger issue here from a public policy perspective is the idea of subsidizing medical school students to enter certain fields. I think that’s a good precedent and should be emulated in other fields like primary care, OB-GYN, geriatrics, etc. As for the secondary issue of MD-PhD degrees versus straight PhDs in biosciences, that’s another matter altogether and should be debated separately.
— Harris Cohen May 16, 04:32 PM #