The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member

Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette

Bedbugs 1, Charity 0

Water-Main Break Damages Library at University in St. Louis


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

May 7, 2008

Harvard Law School Votes for Open Access to Scholarship

Hot on the heels of their colleagues in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, professors at Harvard Law School voted unanimously last week to provide free access to their articles.

The Law School announced its move today in a news release. It will now make its scholarly articles available in a free online database.

Harvard Law School followed a similar decision in February by the university’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences, which became the first academic institution in the United States to make open access the default position, requiring authors to opt out rather than opt in. —Lila Guterman

Posted on Wednesday May 7, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Finally! For all of the “public good” one-liners we hear from institutions of higher ed, their is a reputable entity willing to put it’s money where it’s cliche is.

    — fair play    May 7, 03:46 PM    #

  2. Not that big a deal. These articles are of interest only to academics and occasionally to big law firms. The articles are available on two commercial data bases—Westlaw and Lexis. Academics and big firms already are subscribed to the data bases. Every law school subscribes on behalf of its faculty and students.

    — luigi    May 7, 05:16 PM    #

  3. But Luigi, this means that students who don’t have the cash to go to Harvard can still benefit from the knowledge in those articles. Given the audience for The Chronicle of Higher Education, I don’t think it’s terribly shocking to read that the articles in question are of interest to academics.

    — Dennis G. Jerz    May 7, 07:49 PM    #

  4. Also, Luigi, having more journal articles available in open access archives will help put lower price pressure on the commercial database providers, because more of their content will no longer be exclusively available from them. It may not seem like much to have “just” Harvard, but as the open access model catches on, this may be a truly transformative development in the economics of scholarly communication.

    — Rob    May 7, 08:16 PM    #

  5. Law review articles, unlike all other articles in academic journals, are not truly peer reviewed. They are “edited” by law students who run the journals. There is thus no peer-review process in which the publisher has any investment at all. One wonders, therefore, why law reviews have not long ago been made open access since it is the equivalent of posting unrefereed papers. One also wonders, of course, how reliable they are, not having been given any true peer review.

    — Sandy Thatcher    May 8, 09:11 AM    #

  6. I understand that the previous post gives the opinion of the member of the Board of Directors of the Copyright Clearing Center.

    — Ek    May 20, 02:21 AM    #

  7. When The A&S faculty made a similar decision, some opponent suggested: “Too bad the A&S faculty didn’t talk to the Law School faculty before voting….” The A&S faculty has, apparently, followed this advice.
    (Compare http://chronicle.com/news/article/3943/harvard-faculty-adopts-open-access-requirement#c011117)

    — Ek    May 20, 02:24 AM    #