 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna
Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role
Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois.
Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member
The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said.
Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette
The coach, one of the few African-Americans in big-time college football, was fired after three losing seasons. He sued, saying he had been dismissed because of his race.
The notorious vermin have forced Colorado State University at Fort Collins to cancel its annual Great Sofa Roundup, which allows students to donate unwanted couches.
Water-Main Break Damages Library at University in St. Louis
Summer classes at Harris-Stowe State University resumed today, but the library remains closed.
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58
President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58
Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57
Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57
North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty
Prior days' news: By date | Search
This week's print issue
Back issues: By date | Search
May 6, 2008
Professors Fight 'Academic Freedom' Bills That Question Science in 4 States
University professors have joined other science advocates to battle so-called “academic freedom” bills under consideration in Alabama, Louisiana, Michigan, and Missouri. The bills, along with similar ones that failed to win passage last week in Florida, ask teachers to promote “critical thinking,” especially on topics such as evolution, global warming, and stem-cell research.
The National Center for Science Education, which advocates the teaching of evolution, has tracked the progress of each bill. The Alabama bill would also apply to faculty members at public colleges in the state.
The Panda’s Thumb, a blog for “defenders of the integrity of science,” posted a plea for help last week from Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University and a co-author of Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Ms. Forrest is fighting a pair of bills in the state’s Legislature and asked supporters to contact people they know inside Louisiana to organize resistance.
“We want opposition from inside the state, not outside,” she said. In a set of talking points about one of the Louisiana bills, Ms. Forrest called it a “stealth creationism bill.”
University professors have also helped lead the battles against “academic freedom” bills in other states.
The Discovery Institute, which promotes the teaching of intelligent design, supports the passage of the legislation. In a news release it said that many of the bills are modeled on draft legislation developed by the institute. —Richard Monastersky
Posted on Tuesday May 6, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: New Report Highlights Challenges Facing Business Schools Worldwide
Next: Executive-Search Firm Sees a Business in Finding College Athletics Directors
It just may be that creationism, intelligent design and evolution are three descriptions of the same thing seen from three limited angles; to wit, three blind men describing an elephant. Neither creationism, intelligent design or Darwinian evolution mentions the effects of time and field relativity and quantum mechanics in their explanations; hence all are highly suspect of inaccurately describing the phenomenon.
— first marci May 6, 05:41 PM #
Here we go again. For those who thought that proponents of creationism and Intelligent Design were done trying to snake their way into the science curriculum, think again. Last week, it was Texas. This week, it is Alabama, Michigan, Lousiana, and Missouri. Let us make a stand for rigor, for fact-based assertions, and for free inquiry that doesn’t stop with the Easter Bunny, genies, the Tooth Fairy, or Ms. Cleo’s spot-on astrological predictions.
— Darren Aversa May 6, 05:44 PM #
Mr. Parsons: You neglect to mention you wrote the books you are pimping. As for this “Darwinian view” you are so much against: I’m not sure what that is. All I can say is evolutionary theory is very profitable indeed — and thanks to evolution, you aren’t currently poking a stripped twig in a termite mound for your next meal.
— AliceU May 6, 05:50 PM #
This is a bad bill to put it mildly. Whilst there are a few contraversies amongst scientists over certain exact details regarding the directiion and mechanics of evolution, evolution itself is not in question amongst those who actually have a clue about this topic. These ignorant state law makers need to keep themselves better informed before they start paasing this sort of nonsense in their respective state senates.
— Michael May 7, 01:12 AM #
To legislate “critical thinking” in science courses is of course a specious argument. Critical thinking is one of the bedrock pieces of any science. It’s a given, just as it should be in departments of theology.
— Wayne K. May 7, 08:00 AM #
Michael said “ignorant state lawmakers.” Remember that during the May 3rd GOP debate three candidates said they do not believe in evolution (Sen. Brownback, Rep. Tancredo, and Gov. Huckabee). Perhaps it is time for questions like “Do you believe in evolution?” to be brought up at all levels of politics, since it seems that now it is impacting policy decisions.
— GregS May 7, 08:29 AM #
In January 2008 the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine jointly released “Science, Evolution, and Creationism,” which addresses the issues discussed in this article and the commentaries that follow. The book describes how science differs from other ways of knowing, summarizes the latest accumulating evidence for evolution, and makes the case for why non-scientific “alternatives” should not be taught in science courses. Pdf copies of the book and an 8 page summary brochure can be downloaded through a link on the evolution resources webpage of the National Academy of Sciences, http://nationalacademies.org/evolution. You also can request a free printed copy of the book and brochure by going to http://nasonline.org/secbookletrequest, providing your contact information, and entering the code “SEC15” at the bottom of this web page. The National Academy of Sciences will cover shipping costs.
— Jay May 7, 09:55 AM #
I seem to recall that the Arkansas legislature once decreed the value of pi to be 3.1 to conform to the value given in biblical writings. I suppose we could seek to adjust mathematical theory to accommodate this nonsense, or adjust the theory of orbital mechanics to put Earth at the center of the universe. To dub something a theory or a science that is clearly neither is simply applying the tactics of political spin to dupe the gullible, hoping to enlist their support in lobbying miscellaneous politicos.
— CW May 7, 10:14 AM #
If the bill promotes “critical thinking”, hey great. I can’t see how, using critical thinking, anyone could begin to consider intelligent design is superior in any way, shape, or form to evolution! ID is faith based and therefore outside the realm of critical thinking, unless it is thinking of ways to pass religion off as science. Evolution is the result of 150 years of critical thinking, evidence, and successful predictions.
— W. Powell May 7, 10:34 AM #
Critical thinking is necessary at any institution of higher education. Just leave the faith-based critical thinking where it belongs – in courses relating to theology and religious topics. Critical thinking in science does not relate to intelligent design.
— Al May 7, 11:12 AM #
Science is based on predictability, verifiability, and falsifiability. I don’t see any of these three tennants appearing in Creationism or Intelligent design.
— grgarza May 7, 11:12 AM #
Things happening in a state’s past does not necessarily mean it is the current status. A great number of scientists and science educators in Arkansas are very enlightened and teach to evolution. Do not stereotype based upon past legislatures and former candidates for president, please.
— Higher Educator in the Natural State of Arkansas May 7, 01:53 PM #
Perhaps the question that should have been asked of the former contenders for the GOP nomination should have been:
(1) Do you know what a “theory” is?
(2) Do you comprehend the meaning of Natural Selection and Darwin ideas?
(3) Is the difference between science and unquestioned faith clear to you?
(4) Have you paid attention to nations, past and present, controlled by religious groups.
(Start with the Middle East and work your way back to the Aztecs)
— AW May 7, 05:44 PM #
The Discovery Institute supports the Academic Freedom bills that are surfacing on the basis that “checkpoints” in academia, journals, & the media stop or suppress ideas or “science” that identifies weaknesses in evolutionary theory or provides alternative “theories.” However, when challenged to give examples where such checkpoints have resulted in a K-12 teacher, university professor, or researcher to be fired or not granted tenure, the DI fails to provide credible evidence to support the allegations that the so-called checkpoints are resulting in unjust decisions and covering up flaws in evolutionary theory. Overall, there is no evidence that the academic freedom of teachers is threatened in the states where these bills are emerging.
— Gerald Skoog May 11, 05:18 PM #
The Panda’s Thumb blog practices arbitrary censorship of visitors’ comments and therefore should not be authoritatively cited by any authorities, e.g., the general media, scholarly journal articles, and court opinions.
— Larry Fafarman May 11, 05:52 PM #
The modern synthesis of the theory of evolution is by far the best descriptive and predictive tool available in biology. End of story. To teach ID is worse than teaching Lamarckism – ID’s predictions can’t even be disproved because they don’t have any. All of their “heavyweight” intellectual ideas have been dismantled so thoroughly that they haven’t gotten any research going. How the media or some other set of gatekeepers are responsible for the Discovery Institute’s lack of research is quite a stretch when they have $4+ million of annual budget to play with. Lots of media and legal files. They can end all of this with one simple move: Show us the science guys. Show us the science.
— Peter D Buckland May 13, 06:53 AM #