 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna
Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges
Speaking at a Unesco conference in Paris, the vice president’s wife stressed the importance of two-year institutions to the nation’s educational goals.
Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement
Administrators are scrambling to plug holes in their course schedules for fall, with most expecting to do so by hiring more adjuncts or increasing class sizes.
U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show
The two were among five with houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities.
New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role
Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois.
Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member
The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said.
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58
President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58
Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57
Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57
North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty
Prior days' news: By date | Search
This week's print issue
Back issues: By date | Search
April 24, 2008
For Student Borrowers, Chase Proves Elusive
Washington — Two months ago, as a sense of crisis descended upon the student-loan industry, JP Morgan Chase & Company stood up and said that it not only would continue to supply government-backed loans, but would do so at a discount.
“It sounds so self-serving,” a company spokesman, Thomas A. Kelly, said at the time, “but if you are doing business with a major bank doing student lending, they’re going to be there tomorrow.”
That was two months ago.
Last week the bank’s student-loan division, Chase Education Finance, announced that because of higher financing costs and lower federal subsidy rates, it would no longer offer government-backed loans at colleges with high-risk borrowers.
And today officials at Chase are telephoning the colleges that the bank is still willing to serve to tell them that the discounts it promised in February to maintain — reimbursing students for both the borrower origination fee and the default fee that are required under the federal program — will no longer be paid by Chase on the borrower’s behalf.
Chase provided about $3-billion in federally guaranteed student loans this academic year, the fourth-largest supplier in the government-subsidized program. Mr. Kelly said in February that Chase and other large banks could afford to stay in the program, and even offer discounts, at a time when other lenders were leaving because banks had their own customer deposits and therefore did not need to rely on securities or other forms of outside investment to finance their student lending.
Education Department officials, including the secretary, Margaret Spellings, have cited such assurances from Chase as evidence that the government-backed student-loan program should have enough willing participants this coming academic year.
Mr. Kelly said today, however, that he did not expect Chase to grow beyond the level of student lending it did this year.
“We’re still going to be there,” Mr. Kelly said today, “for as many people as we can afford to do.” —Paul Basken
Posted on Thursday April 24, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Abstract Math Produces Tangible Learning, Study Finds
Next: Where Particles Collide, Sexism Is Rampant, Study Finds
Well, now we know—sh_t happens.
Secretary Spellings was not the only one who cited Chase in arguing that everything was hunky-dory in FFELP. Paul Basken did. Luke Swarthout did. New America Foundation did.
It was an argument of convenience, disingenuous in every regard. Truth be told, they are indifferent to FFELP’s fate.
— Alex Hamilton Apr 24, 04:00 PM #
Hmm. I’m sure Bear Stearns is a better credit risk than our students.
— EK Apr 24, 04:06 PM #
#1 is right….now we’ll hear from those same luminaries that a taxpayer-sponsored bailout is afoot!
— Patrick Bott Apr 24, 05:40 PM #
Congress killed these programs and now will scramble to have taxpayers bail it out. Dont blame Chase for doing the math.
— DC Apr 25, 10:20 AM #
Up til now, Chase denied there were any problems in the industry. Now it is only lending to a select list of schools and has admitted it can no longer waive fees. I hope this makes it clear to folks that there are big problems out there.
— Lynn Apr 25, 10:27 AM #
Congress took a 40-year-old corporate welfare program and took the first steps towards cleaning it up. There’s nothing in the Constitution that says colleges and students must have a choice of 3000 lenders. (There’s actually nothing in the Constitution about the central government getting involved in education at all.) From an economics standpoint, the correct number might be 500 lenders, or it might be 20. We don’t know because they have never tried economics in this program. In addition, the lenders’ temporary financial hiccups have nothing to do with the changes in the student loan programs. The non-bank lenders (who have long gotten higher subsidies, even in last years’ cuts), have been sideswiped by a municipal-bond crisis. The banks are feeling the side effects of the subprime mortgage credit averse behavior. Of course Chase was not immune. No one gets their capital for student loans from deposit accounts. It has long come from investors in Europe, Japan and China.
— Craigie Apr 26, 09:30 AM #