The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"As Supreme Court opinions have stated, affirmative action is not intended to be a permanent fixture in America. Personally, I look forward to living in a country where people are rewarded on their deeds instead of their pigmentation."
— EC

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action

Recent Posts

Washington State Court Says Campus Police Officers Lack Authority to Patrol Dorms

Saint Louis U. to Pay $1-Million to Settle Overbilling Allegations

West Virginia U. Hires Former Chief of Land-Grant Association as Its Interim President

Wedding Bells Ring for Scholars of Genocide and Irrationality

Senate Panel Approves Bill With Big Increase for Energy Research


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 86

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges | 30

Provost of North Carolina State U. Defends Big Raise for Governor's Wife | 29

Lender Jeered as It Departs Federal Student-Loan Program | 27

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action | 23

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

April 16, 2008

White House Backs House Student-Loan Bill, With Reservations

Washington — The White House supports student-loan legislation that the U.S. House of Representatives will vote on tomorrow, but shares for-profit colleges’ concerns that raising federal loan limits could cause some institutions to lose their eligibility to award student aid, the Bush administration said in a statement released late today.

The statement, which is the administration’s official policy on the bill, HR 5715, says President Bush backs provisions that would allow the Education Department to purchase loans from cash-strapped lenders and to designate lenders of last resort on an institution-wide basis, rather than a student-by-student basis.

But the president asks that the education secretary’s authority to designate lenders of last resort be “temporary” and says he fears that raising loan limits, as the bill proposes, would cause some institutions to run afoul of the 90-10 rule, which requires that colleges receive at least 10 percent of their revenues from non-federal sources in order to participate in the federal student-aid program. For-profit colleges have long opposed the rule.

The bill passed the House education committee just last week. —Kelly Field

Posted on Wednesday April 16, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. In 1974 the maximum federally guaranteed student loan was $2500. In 2008, the maximum federally guaranteed student loan for freshmen is $3500. A thousand dollar increase in 34 years does not meet the increase in college costs. Federal grant funds have not bridged the gap. Federal aid policy should be decided based on the greater good – which is the needs of the students being served. We should not require students to borrow higher cost private loans because the for-profit sector will be unable to comply with the 90/10 ruling.

    — Dr. Pat    Apr 17, 09:16 AM    #

  2. Dr. Pat, you make a very good point. It seems government would rather push students towards private lenders instead of raising FGSL’s limits to ease the burden on student’s who have to raise their own tuition. Wouldn’t it be great if all high school students could afford to attend a college without have to worry about a variable interest rate from private lenders?

    — D Marvez    Apr 17, 10:11 AM    #