The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering."
—Gary

NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams

Recent Posts

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action

Oklahoma's Matching-Gift Backlog Booms Despite Moratorium

Italian-American Groups Rally to Save Advanced Placement Test in Italian

U. of Chicago Students Scramble After Lender Pulls Out


Most Commented This Month

Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88

ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77

Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61

U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49

Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

March 31, 2008

Judge Dismisses Constitutional Challenge to U. of California's Course-Evaluation Policies

A federal judge has dismissed claims by the Association of Christian Schools International that the University of California’s policies for evaluating whether high-school courses meet academic-preparation requirements are unconstitutional and discriminate against applicants from Christian high schools. But in his ruling, issued on Friday, Judge S. James Otero of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles allowed the group to continuing pressing challenges to specific course-approval decisions.

The association, known as ASCI, and several students from Calvary Chapel Christian School in Murrieta, Calif., sued the university system in 2005, arguing that it had violated their rights to free speech and religious freedom by refusing to allow the students to use some of the school’s courses to meet admissions requirements.

In a written statement summarizing the ruling, the university said that Judge Otero had found that the university had a legitimate interest in setting academic requirements for admission and that its high-school course-evaluation policies were reasonable. —Paula Wasley

Posted on Monday March 31, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. When everything is filtered through the prism of a Jewish carpenter being God incarnate, it creeps into every facet of their respective academics. Kind of like LaRouche folks—-where every world event is based around the Queen of England’s drug cartel. It just taints everything beyond redemption.

    — marci    Apr 1, 03:15 PM    #