The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"As Supreme Court opinions have stated, affirmative action is not intended to be a permanent fixture in America. Personally, I look forward to living in a country where people are rewarded on their deeds instead of their pigmentation."
— EC

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action

Recent Posts

Washington State Court Says Campus Police Officers Lack Authority to Patrol Dorms

Saint Louis U. to Pay $1-Million to Settle Overbilling Allegations

West Virginia U. Hires Former Chief of Land-Grant Association as Its Interim President

Wedding Bells Ring for Scholars of Genocide and Irrationality

Senate Panel Approves Bill With Big Increase for Energy Research


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 86

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges | 30

Provost of North Carolina State U. Defends Big Raise for Governor's Wife | 29

Lender Jeered as It Departs Federal Student-Loan Program | 27

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action | 23

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

March 11, 2008

NCAA Penalizes Brigham Young U. for Rules Violations

The NCAA has placed Brigham Young University on probation for three years after finding that two prospective men’s volleyball players received thousands of dollars in impermissible benefits from the team’s financial supporters.

A report released today by the NCAA’s Division I Committee on Infractions accused the university of recruitment violations, and found that the team’s former head coach had failed to monitor the team for those violations.

The two recruits were Cuban immigrants. One was allegedly given $13,000 in recruiting incentives by a booster, including $8,000 in legal assistance for his immigration case. A booster also provided improper room and board, transportation, and higher wages to the second recruit.

In addition to its three-year probation, the university was docked scholarships and must limit its recruiting. The boosters are also prevented from associating with BYU’s athletics program for two years.

The university did not immediately return calls about whether it would appeal the ruling. —Hurley Goodall

Posted on Tuesday March 11, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. I root for one of BYU’s opponents, but penalties like this one strike me as unfair. Collusion and unrecorded transactions are notoriously (if not impossible) to detect unless someone in the know blows the whistle.

    Now, if the former head coach chose to ignore a credible whistleblower, I can understand the penalty. If not, these sanctions go too far.

    They are Catch-22s.

    — Auditing 101    Mar 12, 12:38 PM    #