March 11, 2008

Medical Schools Ask Congress to Continue Loan-Deferment Program

Medical schools are asking Congress to reverse the Education Department’s decision to end a program that has allowed borrowers with high debt-to-income ratios to defer interest on their student-loan payments.

In a joint letter sent Monday, the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Medical Association ask the chairmen of Congress’s education committees to preserve the “debt-to-income pathway” of the federal economic-hardship deferment.

That option allows college graduates with federally subsidized loans to defer interest payments if their total debt is more than 20 percent of their income and their income minus their loan payments equals no more than 220 percent of the poverty level. The option has benefited many medical-school students during the three to eight years they are in residency programs.

In 2007 the average medical student graduated with $140,000 in debt, and the average first-year resident earned less than $45,000, according to the letter. Eliminating the provision, the letter warns, could discourage students from pursuing less-lucrative careers in medical education, research, public health, or primary medicine.

The department announced plans to end the provision at a rule-making session last week, saying the program would cost taxpayers $1.1-billion over the next decade. The decision was generally supported by financial-aid advocates, who said the money could be better spent on needier borrowers. Most medical residents, they pointed out, are on the verge of earning salaries that will easily allow them to repay their loans. —Kelly Field

Comments

1. As we consider new options to help students, I wonder if we should consider our own loan deferment plan for those who go into service careers. It may not be possible, but I would love for someone to explore what we could do as an institution. FYI. Darryl

   — darryl tippens    Mar 11, 04:21 PM    #

2. Enough! As a nation we need to balance our knowledge portfolio. $1.1 B invested in a low risk high reward cohort of physicians with advanced training should not be sacrificed because some of these physicians will some day earn a lot of money. Medical care and research is something we excel at and should be supported. These students have already proved capable of graduating in competitive undergraduate and medical school environments and are fully credentialed to practice medicine. They’ve earned the opportunity for this pathway and are no less deserving than those “needier borrowers.”

   — Andy Novobilski    Mar 12, 11:23 AM    #

Previous: 2 More Embryonic-Stem-Cell Patents at U. of Wisconsin Are Upheld
Next: State Court Rules Against Ohio U. Professor in Age-Bias Case