The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

February 12, 2008

Biology Journal Cites Plagiarism in Retracting Creationist Paper

The peer-reviewed journal that published a biology paper mentioning the “mighty creator” has retracted the article. The paper’s downfall was not its creationist statements, however, but its “apparently plagiarised passages from several previously published articles,” according to a news release issued by the journal’s publisher, Wiley-VCH.

The paper has drawn a blizzard of criticism in the blogosphere about the peer-review process at the journal, Proteomics. The editor of the journal, Michael J. Dunn, a professor at University College Dublin’s Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, told The Chronicle last week that the paper had passed peer review.

Today’s announcement says that the two authors of the article, who are scientists at Inje University, in South Korea, agreed to the retraction. Initially only one of the authors had asked for a retraction.

In the news announcement, Mr. Dunn said: “Clearly human error has caused a misstep in the normally rigorous peer review that is standard practice for Proteomics and should prevent such issues arising.” —Lila Guterman

Posted on Tuesday February 12, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. This is a thin announcement. Dunn does not assert external reviewers are to blame, and relatedly he does not answer for his own role here. The paper in question had an absurd title and a preposterous abstract. The ultimate fraudulence of the paper was advertised from the get-go.

    — Jay Clayton    Feb 12, 02:51 PM    #

  2. Agree with Jay. Whatever associate editor was responsible for handling this piece of trash needs to go. Some accountability, please!

    — Gerard Harbison, UNL    Feb 12, 06:35 PM    #

  3. I also agree. Plagiarism must be taken seriously. In college and high school we treat plagarsim very seriously but over here we have Professors accused of plagerism. Now days students use sites like

    tutorvista.com and
    http://www.myhwsolution.com to plagerize. The review process of this journal is definately flawed. The reviewers are also responsible because they failed to do their job.

    — James Howard Smith    Feb 19, 05:51 AM    #