 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna
Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show
The two were among five that houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities.
New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role
Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois.
Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member
The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said.
Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette
The coach, one of the few African-Americans in big-time college football, was fired after three losing seasons. He sued, saying he had been dismissed because of his race.
The notorious vermin have forced Colorado State University at Fort Collins to cancel its annual Great Sofa Roundup, which allows students to donate unwanted couches.
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58
President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58
Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57
Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57
North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty
Prior days' news: By date | Search
This week's print issue
Back issues: By date | Search
February 6, 2008
Move to Lift Head-Scarf Ban Wins First Approval in Turkey's Parliament
Turkish lawmakers voted early Thursday morning to amend their country’s Constitution to allow observant Muslim women to wear head scarves at universities. The controversial measure, which requires a two-thirds majority for final passage, won preliminary approval on a secret ballot by a vote of more than 400 in favor and about 90 against after a marathon parliament session that had begun 12 hours earlier, according to news reports.
The result had been expected since the governing party and the main opposition party announced late last month that they had reached an agreement to rescind the head-scarf ban, but the measure’s likely passage has only inflamed debate and tensions around the issue, which has long been a lightning rod of controversy between secularists and observant Muslims. Last Saturday, more than 100,000 opponents of the ban’s removal — most of them women — marched in protest in Ankara, the Turkish capital.
Turkey’s Higher Education Council, a staunchly secularist government body that oversees all of the country’s universities, has backed the head-scarf ban since its introduction, in the early 1980s, and a group of state university rectors last week condemned the move to rescind the ban as a weakening of Turkey’s constitutional commitment to secular education.
Many academics, however, support allowing observant Muslim women to wear the head scarf as a profession of their religious faith. A newspaper in Turkey reported that more than 3,000 people had signed a declaration in support of head-scarf freedom in universities since Friday. Some signers told the newspaper, Today’s Zaman, that they had come under pressure for expressing their views.
Another, final round of voting on the head-scarf measure will take place on Saturday, but at least one opposition party has vowed to challenge any changes to the Constitution in court, and many university officials have said they do not expect the ban to be lifted in practice anytime soon. —Aisha Labi
Posted on Wednesday February 6, 2008 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: UCLA Professor's House Is Firebombed
Next: Educause Lobbies Against Piracy Measure in House Bill
Education is permitted for all Turkish citizens. I just wonder how it will effect their application to join the European Union.
— Doris Martin Feb 7, 01:05 AM #
What a step backward. Islamist fanatics will gradually turn Turkey into a Sunni version of Iran.
— Marty Feb 7, 09:14 AM #
Up to here all is well and fair. The big question is: What will happen next? Will it breed more freedom and consequent peace or will it breed division and fights on campus?
— concerned academic Feb 7, 01:31 PM #
How is allowing students to freely express and participate in their religious tradition a step backwards? Should Turkey take a firm stance against any symbolic religious expression? Should Christians be prevented from wearing a cross or a crucifix? And should Jews be prevented from wearing the Star of David or a kippah? The suppression of religion is more of a crime against democracy then allowing people to express their devotion by wearing meaningful symbols. participation
— GeorgeWill Feb 7, 02:36 PM #
Go to turkey and visit their universities — women view the universities as bastions of freedom. That is why this is a step backwards.
— Ray Feb 7, 03:35 PM #
Permission is not a requirement. I don’t see the problem. If/when it turns into a requirement, there would be a problem.
— Al Feb 7, 05:51 PM #