The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

January 4, 2008

Chief Executive at Strayer Inc. Is Named CEO of the Year

The chief executive of Strayer Inc., a higher-education company that has pointedly avoided the aggressive growth strategies of many of its competitors, has been named CEO of the Year for 2007 by Morningstar, an independent investment-research company.

Strayer, based in Arlington, Va., owns Strayer University, which operates 51 campuses in 12 states in the eastern United States and Washington, D.C. Strayer enrolls 36,000 students, about half of whom take all their courses online.

Morningstar said it had chosen to honor Strayer’s CEO, Robert Silberman, because he has “created a culture at Strayer that would rather provide quality education with subpar short-term financial performance than offer subpar education for short-term financial gain.”

In an industry where competitors seek to bolster their revenue by “packing students into seats regardless of the consequences,” Morningstar said Strayer was notable for “keeping growth at a manageable eight to 10 campuses a year” — an approach that “has helped ensure that Strayer’s schools are opened only when qualified faculty and staff are available.”

As Morningstar noted, the company is also among the most financially successful of its peers, with profit margins of about 30 percent.

Mr. Silberman, who formerly ran an energy company and was an assistant secretary of the Army during the first Bush administration, became CEO in 2001. —Goldie Blumenstyk

Posted on Friday January 4, 2008 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. This is refreshing to read. For profit education can be as ethical, memorable and academically sound as that offered at other insitutions.
    But we all know that is not always the case.
    Kudos to Robert Silberman and to Morningstar for the award. May their joint examples encourage others to act accordingly.

    — Gustavo A. Mellander    Jan 4, 11:26 PM    #

  2. When an investment company recommends a higher education institution, via awarding an award for something to it or its CEO, we can expect it is operating out of an investment perspective, primarily, and a quality of education perspective, secondarily. Ten campuses a year as a “modest” growth rate that enables “quality” of faculty is a proposition that makes sense primarily and possibly only in the context of Univ. of Phoenix and others institutions that teach buzzwords, changing courses whenever Microsoft or Oracle invent new acronym-bearing computer somethings. In THAT context, this CEO and institution are being given an award. We need not get all hot and bothered about either the primary or secondary context in which this event has taken place. We can applaud the strict separation between business and academic functions maintained as a matter of policy by the initial leaders of this institution. However, history indicates the most likely outcome is a second or third generation that completely ruins such principles in the name of personal career advancement or pleasing investors grown restless, not at their actual returns but at the way those returns look when viewed by increments of greed, stimulated by nearly anything.

    — Richard Tabor Greene    Jan 7, 05:56 AM    #