The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"My family made me so nuts that I not only went to college halfway across the country, but took an extra year to graduate and then remained in that state almost 20 years." --GRF

New Study on College-Going Rates Gives Mom Something Else to Worry About

Recent Posts

N.C. Community Colleges May Admit Illegal Immigrants, Federal Agency Says

Robert Bork and Yale Club Settle $1-Million Lawsuit Out of Court

Chairman of West Virginia U. Board Quits Post but Will Not Leave Board

Universities in Lebanon Close Because of Fighting

Social Scientist in Army's 'Human Terrain' Program Dies in Afghanistan


Most Commented This Month

Cal State Instructor Fired for Refusing to Sign Loyalty Oath | 71

Princeton U. Press Recalls Typo-Filled Book and Says It Will Reprint | 55

U. of Florida Plans Layoffs and Enrollment Cuts as State Funds Fall | 38

Indian Students Protest Exam Question on Muhammad | 35

Ohio State U. Housing Administrator Is Suspended After Arrest on Drug Charges | 34

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

December 21, 2007

Academic Winners and Losers in the Vast Federal Spending Bill for 2008

Washington — The vast spending bill that Congress passed this week, nearly three months late, created many prominent winners and losers in academe. On the minus side of the ledger, the National Institutes of Health took nearly a $1-billion hit to its 2008 budget, while scientific research and education programs were also cut substantially, as Congress slashed millions in domestic spending in order to meet President Bush’s budget request and thereby avoid a veto.

Mr. Bush is expected to sign the bill, which covers nearly every federal agency for the fiscal year that began on October 1.

Among the big losers was the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, in Illinois, which will lay off 10 percent of its staff, force workers to take unpaid days off, and cut back on research, according to today’s Chicago Tribune.

Among the winners were supporters of open access in scientific publishing, the view that the results of taxpayer-financed research should be freely available to the public, not locked up in costly journals. Under the legislation, recipients of NIH grants will have to provide copies of their research papers to an NIH database once they are accepted for publication in a journal. The database would then post the papers within 12 months.

The two-year-old repository has so far received faltering use because posting papers was requested, not required. The Association of American Publishers, which lobbied against the provision, told The Washington Post that “the issue isn’t finished yet.” That’s certainly true enough; the provision will expire at the end of the 2008 fiscal year.

Other big winners were the many recipients of academic earmarks in the huge bill. Some recipients of academic and other earmarks — grants directed by members of Congress to favored constituents — can be examined on a list posted on the Web site of Sen. Jim W. DeMint, a Republican of South Carolina. According to a tally by Citizens Against Government Waste, the overall number of earmarks increased 11 percent over the last such federal appropriations bill. —Andrew Mytelka

Posted on Friday December 21, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. As usual, throw money at the losing cause that is IRAQ and at the same time throw away our country’s future that is todays research and education.

    — mlm    Dec 21, 08:10 PM    #

  2. I don’t mind earmarks too much, as long as we not financing a abhorent, greed mongur war!

    — Chuck Kramer    Dec 22, 10:20 AM    #