The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

December 3, 2007

Berkeley Professor Wins Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order

Philip E. Tetlock, a professor of business administration and political science at the University of California at Berkeley, has won the 2008 Grawemeyer Award for “ideas improving world order,” the University of Louisville has announced. Mr. Tetlock will receive the $200,000 prize for his research on the accuracy of high-profile advisers on issues of public policy.

Predictions on political issues are frequently wrong, says Mr. Tetlock, which is unfortunate because lawmakers frequently rely on such analyses to shape policy. In a 20-year study of 27,000 predictions made by 284 “experts” cited in the news media, he found that, very often, the professionals were no more accurate in their crystal-ball gazing than ordinary people.

“In this age of academic hyperspecialization, there is no reason for supposing that contributors to top journals—distinguished political scientists, area-study specialists, economists, and so on—are any better than journalists or attentive readers of The New York Times in ‘reading’ emerging situations,” writes Mr. Tetlock in his 2005 book about the study, Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton).

Experts need to receive more training and be held publicly accountable for their advice, he argues in the book.

The award for ideas improving world order is one of five Grawemeyer prizes that are presented each year in recognition of achievements in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. It is the second Grawemeyer prize to be announced this week. The prize for music composition was awarded on Monday to the composer Peter Lieberson for the song cycle “Neruda Songs.” Winners in the categories of psychology, education, and religion are scheduled to be announced later this week.

The awards were created in 1984 by H. Charles Grawemeyer, an industrialist and a University of Louisville alumnus. More information about the Grawemeyer Awards and the Grawemeyer Foundation at the University of Louisville is available on the organization’s Web site. —Jason Breslow

Posted on Monday December 3, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. As with the weather, people who predict “tomorrow will be the same as today” are statistically more accurate than those who base their predictions on analytical data.

    — marci    Dec 4, 12:39 PM    #

  2. Intelligence is a matter of how many decision-weighting variables one can juggle simultaneously. Politics show that better than any other field. “Experts” almost by definition exclude all the variable they aren’t interested in, resulting in unintelligent predictions.

    — David A. McCullough    Dec 4, 01:57 PM    #

  3. Tetlock’s conclusions heartening to old political diletantes like me who have followed political events for twice as long as most media pundits. Accidentally I am correct once in a while, too.

    — Paul R. Cooper    Dec 4, 02:07 PM    #

  4. $200,000 is an off-the-wall sum for a specific and recent piece of work. That’s not Professor Tetlock’s fault of course, but he may want to do some survey research on whether academic administrators view the opinions of big cash prizewinners as more (or less) reliable on certain issues ;).

    — Sam    Dec 4, 04:35 PM    #