|
|
In the Comments
"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all. Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors
Recent Posts
Bible Professor Will Leave Seminary Instead of Facing Hearing The faculty member wrote a book expressing the view that human beings shaped the Bible, an idea deemed contrary to the conservative seminary’s faculty oath. Comment [5] Purdue U. Scientist Appeals Findings of Research Misconduct Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, a nuclear engineer, challenged a university panel that said he had misled other scientists about his research into nuclear fusion. Embattled Congressman Calls for Investigation Into His Actions on Behalf of CCNY Rep. Charles Rangel used Congressional letterhead to seek donations for an academic center bearing his name. Comment [3] Baylor U. Regents Fire President, Citing Failure to Unite Campus John M. Lilley, the university’s president since November 2005, had been at the center of several recent controversies. Comment [7] U. of Texas Investment Directors Vote to Repeal Ethics Rule Under a proposed rule change, directors would be permitted to invest in the same funds as the University of Texas Investment Management Company.
Most Commented This Month
Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104 Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92 Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59 College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54 Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search November 28, 2007Report Calls U. of California 'The Immigrant University'About 54 percent of students in the University of California system — and about 63 percent of those at its prestigious Berkeley campus — have at least one parent who is an immigrant, according to a report released this month. The report, by researchers at the Berkeley campus’s Center for Studies in Higher Education, is based on a 2006 survey of the University of California system’s undergraduates. Because only 38 percent of students responded, its numbers are not exact, even though the researchers involved regard them as close. The report says “the startling number and range” of student backgrounds revealed through its survey “points to the need for an expanded notion of diversity beyond older racial and ethnic paradigms.” Among its key findings, the report says that just 54 percent of undergraduates in the university system said that English was their sole first language. At the Berkeley campus, 28 percent of undergraduates immigrated to the United States, and 72 percent of undergraduates have at least one immigrant grandparent. Throughout the university system, 95 percent of Asian-American students, 88 percent of Hispanic students, and 40 percent of white students reported that they or at least one parent or grandparent came from outside the United States. The report says that first- or second-generation immigrant students tend to gravitate toward fields such as engineering and the sciences, and to be focused heavily on careers and professional prestige. Although some come from low-income backgrounds, most are more likely than other immigrants to come from families that are well educated. —Peter Schmidt Posted on Wednesday November 28, 2007 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: U.S. 4th Graders Trail Peers in Many Other Nations in Reading
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
The Jewish mother has been replaced by the Asian mother.
— marci Nov 28, 11:32 AM #
A 38% response rate across 10 campuses and the researchers have the audacity to even publish this study? If we need an example of why education research is so poorly regarded, this report is it.
— doug Nov 28, 12:37 PM #
38% frankly sounds like a rather high response rate for a quanitative survey.
— Andrew Nov 28, 03:14 PM #
I would think that the study should be replicated for a larger sample of the student body (51%), except we are told that sampling procedures have produced a certain degree of confidence and in any terms, the conclusions can only be limited to UC.
— Sylvan Nov 28, 03:25 PM #
Regard the last sentence of the penultimate paragraph: what minority is absent? What could this absence indicate?
— richard Nov 28, 03:51 PM #
I wonder what the percentage of immigrant parents and grandparents would have been if the poll had been taken in 1950 or ’60, say.
— Mark Nov 28, 03:52 PM #
We should not care that much about the response rate but rather if the responders were reflective of the population surveyed. If you get a 50% response rate and then learn only males responded you still have a problem, unless you restrict your comments to males only.
— richard Nov 28, 03:55 PM #
Richard, It indicates to me that most African American students at UC are themselves born in the U.S. and that both their parents were born here. The fact that African Americans may be underrepresented at UC is a separate issue, I think.
— Rob Nov 28, 04:22 PM #
Whatever hapened to the kids whose both parents were born here?
Of course there aren’t too many that have two parents AND were born here. What is this country becoming?
— STP Nov 29, 12:39 AM #
One thing this data might tells us is that for all the caterwauling about “diversity,” the UC student body is much more richly varied than would be apparent by a superficial look at racial breakdowns.
— J. Ward Nov 29, 12:50 AM #