The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering."
—Gary

NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams

Recent Posts

U. of Nevada at Reno, Facing Dozens of Lawsuits, Spends Big on Outside Legal Help

Canadian Panel to Investigate University's Halting of Controversial Research

Dispute Over Academic Freedom Roils Turkish-Studies Institute

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action


Most Commented This Month

Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88

ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77

Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61

U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49

Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 27, 2007

New York Medical College Will Halt Use of Dogs in Labs

New York Medical College says it will no longer use live dogs in a physiology teaching lab, The Journal News reported today.

The institution had come under fire from students, animal-rights groups, and politicians for being the only medical college in the state to still use live animals in its teaching labs.

Beginning early next year, students will use simulators and echocardiography, or heart ultrasounds, in the first-year physiology lab, college officials announced on Monday.

Only 11 allopathic medical schools still use live animals in teaching, according to John J. Pippin, a cardiologist in Dallas who works with a group called the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Karl Adler, president of the college, said high-tech substitutes now make it possible to teach students skills that they had been learning by opening a dog’s heart and watching it beat. “The reason why the dogs were used in the past is that the students could actually see a beating heart, and understand the physiology of how the heart works,” he said. “It’s the only internal organ where there’s actually movement that you can understand the physiology of.”

Beginning in 2008, students will use simulators that mimic cardiac arrest or the effects of a drug, and portable machines that allow them to attach electrodes to a student’s chest and watch the heart’s activity on a video monitor. —Katherine Mangan

Posted on Tuesday November 27, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. In the future please remind me to ask the doctor where he/she went to medical school. I personally don’t want to receive treatment from anyone who has not been trained on living tissue. Computer programs are only as reliable as those who program them.

    — Valerie Cole    Nov 28, 12:02 PM    #

  2. Valerie, I don’t believe this story was meant to imply that the schools are eliminating EVERY form of medical education that might involve real tissue, and replacing them all with man-made computer programs.

    I think there are clearly some purposes where computer simulations or alternative (non-invasive) forms of live observation can provide viable (pun not intended!) substitutes. For something as straightforward as observing the mechanics of a heartbeat: if you can use a portable monitor to watch your classmate’s real live heart tissue beating, then that seems vastly preferable to cutting open some poor animal just to make the same observation.

    — Erin    Nov 28, 06:19 PM    #