The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 19, 2007

Audit: Pennsylvania Loan Agency Improperly Received More Than $33-Million

Washington — A final audit report released today by the U.S. Education Department found that the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency has received at least $33-million in improper federal subsidy payments on student loans.

The student-loan agency, known as Pheaa, was one of several lenders that took advantage of a loophole in federal student-aid law that allowed it to receive guaranteed subsidies from the government far above market-based interest rates.

The controversy involving the overpayments dates from the 1980s, when Congress allowed nonprofit lenders — those that finance their loans with tax-exempt bonds — a guaranteed return of 9.5 percent to help protect them at a time when the economy was in the doldrums and the cost of making loans was high. Congress eliminated the 9.5-percent guarantee in 1993 but grandfathered in loans already made.

Most nonprofit lenders maintained that the government’s regulations allowed them to continue receiving the 9.5-percent return by simply refinancing bonds issued before the cutoff date.

In response to today’s report, Edward M. Kennedy, a Democrat and chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, issued a statement urging the Education Department to move aggressively to recoup money from Pheaa and to undertake a full-scale review of every lender that received subsidies after the 9.5-percent law was repealed.

“It’s obvious that we’ve only scratched the surface in terms of revealing the full extent of the 9.5-percent-loan scandal,” Senator Kennedy said.

The interim president of the Pennsylvania student-loan agency sent a letter to Margaret Spellings, the U.S. education secretary, urging her to reject the audit.

“Pheaa has always been in compliance with the department’s regulations,” said James Preston, the interim president. He said that the audit report “ignores 10 years of our compliance with regulations.”

The department’s review of payments to Pheaa marked the third major investigation that the inspector general has conducted into lenders’ misuse of federal student-aid dollars in recent years. —Sara Hebel

Posted on Monday November 19, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Any chance of a criminal indictment here?

    — Marge Ryan    Nov 20, 10:34 AM    #

  2. None, because no laws were overtly broken. Multiple lenders undertook this practice because the Dept. of Education allowed it under its interpretation of the law at the time. The AG has just now offered a different interpretation that makes these actions “illegal”. At worst, PHEAA will receive a hefty fine. At best, the Secretary of Education will admit that the Department’s own mismanagement led to these legal practices. An honest accounting would simply turn off the faucet without penalizing lenders who were working under the Department’s own interpretation of the law at the time.

    — Tom Sabers    Nov 20, 11:19 AM    #