The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member

Court Overturns $2-Million Verdict for Former Coach at U. of Louisiana-Lafayette

Bedbugs 1, Charity 0

Water-Main Break Damages Library at University in St. Louis


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 16, 2007

House Override Fails, Threatening Academic Earmarks

The House of Representatives failed to override the president’s veto of the 2008 spending bill for labor, health, and education last night, as Senate leaders began drafting a compromise.

President Bush vetoed the appropriations measure earlier this week, calling it too expensive. The House’s 277-to-141 vote last night fell short of the two-thirds majority needed to override the veto.

Yesterday, shortly before the House vote, the Senate majority leader, Harry M. Reid, said Democrats would send Mr. Bush an omnibus spending bill in December that would split the difference between their budget proposals.

The compromise bill would allot $147.2-billion to labor, health, and education, about $3.5-billion less than Congress had proposed, but more than the president’s budget request of $140.9-billion, says Congress Daily. The new spending level would be 1.8 percent above the 2007 level, not enough to keep up with inflation.

The reduction would mean that education and labor programs and academic earmarks would probably be cut. Some Democrats are warning that the Pell Grant maximum may not stand.

Even so, it’s not certain that the president will agree to the compromise. The White House reacted “coolly” to the Senate proposal, brushing off the offer to negotiate, Congress Daily reports.

If the president doesn’t budge, education and labor programs could take an even bigger hit. —Kelly Field

Posted on Friday November 16, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. You have to hand it to Congress. Just when you thought that there wasn’t anything more uselss than teats on a boar…

    Chalk up another victory for HRH Shrub II.

    — Aelfinn    Nov 16, 04:26 PM    #

  2. So Bush ( Hypocrite ) is veto happy. Well, at least he is signing something. Hey… hundreds of billions of dollars have to go somewhere right?

    — Alex    Nov 17, 11:59 AM    #

  3. When must we pronounce the great Sallie Mae privatization experiment a failure?

    — Thomas    Nov 17, 04:12 PM    #