The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all.
— Debbie C

Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors

Recent Posts

Bible Professor Will Leave Seminary Instead of Facing Hearing

Purdue U. Scientist Appeals Findings of Research Misconduct

Embattled Congressman Calls for Investigation Into His Actions on Behalf of CCNY

Baylor U. Regents Fire President, Citing Failure to Unite Campus

U. of Texas Investment Directors Vote to Repeal Ethics Rule


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104

Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92

Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59

College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54

Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 9, 2007

$20-Million Gift Bought Donor a Role in Picking UC-Irvine Law Dean

The University of California at Irvine agreed to “periodically and confidentially consult” an Orange County billionaire on the selection of an inaugural law dean in exchange for his $20-million gift, the Los Angeles Times reported today.

Both the university and the donor, Donald Bren, insist that despite that agreement, which was revealed in documents obtained by the Times, Mr. Bren did not torpedo the initial appointment of Erwin Chemerinsky as founding dean.

The university’s chancellor, Michael V. Drake, touched off a national furor when he hired, fired, then rehired the noted legal scholar in a matter of weeks (The Chronicle, September 28). Mr. Chemerinsky said the chancellor had told him his decision was prompted by outside political pressure over the professor’s liberal views. Mr. Drake said that’s not the case.

The university’s agreement with Mr. Bren also stipulated that, on building signs, the donor’s name must be at least twice the size of the name of the building. —Katherine Mangan

Posted on Friday November 9, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. “The university’s agreement with Mr. Bren also stipulated that, on building signs, the donor’s name must be at least twice the size of the name of the building.” That’s just tacky.

    — scotteebee    Nov 9, 05:06 PM    #

  2. I wouldn’t be so quick to vilify the donor in this case – it is his money. But Chancellor Drake might want to consider growing a set before accepting his next $20-million…or hiring his next dean.

    — Ricardo    Nov 10, 10:27 AM    #

  3. This is yet another warning to those too eager to accept donations. The university should set the conditions of the donation, not the donor. The donor is also getting something out of this relationship with the university. The university, all educational institutions, should stop being so grateful for any money they get that they are willing to forgo the overall mission. Legislatures should be pressured to stop de-funding education – like California’s governor is doing – and remember that the goal of a state is to take care of its people. And yes, the sign issue is tacky.

    — Marie Nubia-Feliciano, M.S.    Nov 16, 02:50 PM    #