The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 8, 2007

American Institutions Fare Well in British List of World's Top Universities

American institutions dominate the latest edition of a ranking of the world’s top 200 international universities by the Times Higher Education Supplement and Quacquarelli Symonds, a company that provides career and education information. Fifty-seven American institutions made this year’s list, dubbed the “THES-QS World University Rankings,” which will be published online tomorrow. They include private universities, such as the eight Ivy League institutions, as well as public powerhouses like several University of California branches and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

The BBC News, in a report on the rankings, noted that British universities had improved their performance on the list, claiming four of the top 10 spots. But the rest in that group were American. Harvard University was ranked No. 1, while Yale University and the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge tied for second place. Rounding out the top 10 were, in order: Imperial College London, Princeton University, the California Institute of Technology, the University of Chicago, University College London, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The THES-QS rankings, now in their third year, are based on reviews by faculty members and corporate recruiters, and measures such as the ratio of faculty members to students and how often faculty members’ publications are cited. The British list and a similar compilation produced by China’s Shanghai Jiao Tong University have helped to fuel internationally the kind of scrutiny and discussion that such popular ranking systems have long provoked in the United States (The Chronicle, May 25).

Amid growing international competition for foreign students, and because of the influence such lists wield on students’ decisions about where to study, scholars increasingly are raising questions about the methodology the rankings employ. The authors of a recent paper in BMC Medicine noted a number of problems in existing lists and suggested that, absent improvements, such rankings should be abandoned. —Aisha Labi

Posted on Thursday November 8, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. without bragging too much, it’s worth pointing out that the #1 North American public university on this list is McGill in Montreal, Canada!

    — patrick gutteridge    Nov 8, 04:17 PM    #

  2. The immaturity of these measures and rankings is shown by some universities rising a dozen points and others falling by similar amounts. This either means that the rankings are too crude, or that they are much too sensitive to the data used. Frankly, universities are pretty conservative enterprises, and it is highly unlikely that any one of them has implemented changes so dramatic as to allow substantial gains or declines in just a single year! Consumer beware…

    — Hassan Aref    Nov 8, 06:03 PM    #

  3. way to go, eh!

    — Bill j    Nov 8, 06:16 PM    #