|
|
In the Comments
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Recent Posts
Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges Speaking at a Unesco conference in Paris, the vice president’s wife stressed the importance of two-year institutions to the nation’s educational goals. Comment [1] Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement Administrators are scrambling to plug holes in their course schedules for fall, with most expecting to do so by hiring more adjuncts or increasing class sizes. Comment [1] U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show The two were among five with houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities. New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois. Comment [5] Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said. Comment [4]
Most Commented This Month
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58 President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58 Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57 Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57 North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search November 8, 2007American Institutions Fare Well in British List of World's Top UniversitiesAmerican institutions dominate the latest edition of a ranking of the world’s top 200 international universities by the Times Higher Education Supplement and Quacquarelli Symonds, a company that provides career and education information. Fifty-seven American institutions made this year’s list, dubbed the “THES-QS World University Rankings,” which will be published online tomorrow. They include private universities, such as the eight Ivy League institutions, as well as public powerhouses like several University of California branches and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. The BBC News, in a report on the rankings, noted that British universities had improved their performance on the list, claiming four of the top 10 spots. But the rest in that group were American. Harvard University was ranked No. 1, while Yale University and the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge tied for second place. Rounding out the top 10 were, in order: Imperial College London, Princeton University, the California Institute of Technology, the University of Chicago, University College London, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The THES-QS rankings, now in their third year, are based on reviews by faculty members and corporate recruiters, and measures such as the ratio of faculty members to students and how often faculty members’ publications are cited. The British list and a similar compilation produced by China’s Shanghai Jiao Tong University have helped to fuel internationally the kind of scrutiny and discussion that such popular ranking systems have long provoked in the United States (The Chronicle, May 25). Amid growing international competition for foreign students, and because of the influence such lists wield on students’ decisions about where to study, scholars increasingly are raising questions about the methodology the rankings employ. The authors of a recent paper in BMC Medicine noted a number of problems in existing lists and suggested that, absent improvements, such rankings should be abandoned. —Aisha Labi Posted on Thursday November 8, 2007 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Britain Begins New Security Checks for Some Foreign Students
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
without bragging too much, it’s worth pointing out that the #1 North American public university on this list is McGill in Montreal, Canada!
— patrick gutteridge Nov 8, 04:17 PM #
The immaturity of these measures and rankings is shown by some universities rising a dozen points and others falling by similar amounts. This either means that the rankings are too crude, or that they are much too sensitive to the data used. Frankly, universities are pretty conservative enterprises, and it is highly unlikely that any one of them has implemented changes so dramatic as to allow substantial gains or declines in just a single year! Consumer beware…
— Hassan Aref Nov 8, 06:03 PM #
way to go, eh!
— Bill j Nov 8, 06:16 PM #