The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering."
—Gary

NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams

Recent Posts

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action

Oklahoma's Matching-Gift Backlog Booms Despite Moratorium

Italian-American Groups Rally to Save Advanced Placement Test in Italian

U. of Chicago Students Scramble After Lender Pulls Out


Most Commented This Month

Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88

ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77

Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61

U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49

Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

November 6, 2007

Cal State Told to Tighten Up Its Pay Practices

California State University needs to establish stricter policies for compensating its current and former employees and to provide better oversight of those decisions, according to a state review.

The findings of the Bureau of State Audits, which were released today, concluded that the 23-campus system had not broken any laws or violated university policies in the ways it has compensated executives and other employees.

But the report, which was requested by the state’s Joint Legislative Audit Committee, made six recommendations for how Cal State should seek to improve its practices.

The auditors said the university system should create a centralized information structure to catalog compensation; consider total compensation at comparable institutions, and not just cash compensation, when deciding on salary increases for employees; improve the scrutiny of pay provided to executives as they leave their jobs; develop stronger regulations to govern paid leaves of absence; strengthen policies governing relocation expenses; and impose new disclosure and approval requirements on outside employment for faculty members and other employees.

Faculty members and legislators have criticized Cal State for providing what they see as excessive compensation to administrators. At a time of tuition increases, they have found fault, for example, with six-figure paychecks to departing executives, whom they say did little or no work in their job transitions.

Cal State officials said today that they felt vindicated by the auditors’ having found no violations of policy or law. They also called the report’s findings and recommendations fair and balanced.

“We agree with all of the auditors’ recommendations in concept and will be working with the board on the most feasible way to implement them,” said Charles B. Reed, the chancellor. —Sara Hebel

Posted on Tuesday November 6, 2007 | Permalink |