The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

September 20, 2007

Pell Grant Increase in 2008 Budget Is Not a Sure Thing, Key Congressman Says

Washington — The chairman of the House Appropriations Committee warned education lobbyists today that they may never see the $2-billion Pell Grant increase that his panel approved in July.

In a speech before the Committee for Education Funding, a coalition of 100 education associations, Rep. David R. Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat, said that President Bush was serious in threatening to veto the education-spending bill, which would raise the maximum Pell Grant by $390 in the 2008 fiscal year, which begins on October 1. If the president carried out that threat, Mr. Obey said, lawmakers may lack the votes to override the veto.

“You will be very, very lucky to get one dime more than the president has in his budget for education,” he said. “There is going to have to be a lot more noise coming from the education community than we’ve heard to date.”

But it’s unclear whether the Pell Grant Program will get a discretionary increase even if Mr. Bush abandons his veto threat. The Senate’s version of the appropriations bill, which must be reconciled with the House’s version, contains no increase for the program, and appropriators have been talking about shifting some of the Pell money in the House bill to other programs now that Congress has passed legislation providing for a mandatory increase for the program.

That bill, a budget-reconciliation measure that the president is expected to sign, would increase the maximum Pell Grant to $5,400 over five years, provided that appropriators do not cut the program’s baseline. —Kelly Field

Posted on Thursday September 20, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Still not enough money. And they will still need a loan and the lenders will still be able to set their own interest rates.

    — Tascha Chalmers    Sep 21, 09:23 AM    #