 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna
Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges
Speaking at a Unesco conference in Paris, the vice president’s wife stressed the importance of two-year institutions to the nation’s educational goals.
Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement
Administrators are scrambling to plug holes in their course schedules for fall, with most expecting to do so by hiring more adjuncts or increasing class sizes.
U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show
The two were among five with houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities.
New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role
Linda P.B. Katehi, the incoming chancellor of the University of California at Davis, has insisted she knew nothing of the admission of politically connected applicants at Illinois.
Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member
The foundation will be forced to issue fewer scholarships in the 2010-11 academic year because of a diminished endowment, a university official said.
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58
President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58
Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57
Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57
North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty
Prior days' news: By date | Search
This week's print issue
Back issues: By date | Search
September 11, 2007
University-Press Leader Quit Publishers' Panel Over Anti-Open-Access Campaign
At least one top university-press director spoke out against the Partnership for Research Integrity in Science & Medicine, or Prism, a controversial new anti-open-access campaign sponsored by the Association of American Publishers, before it went public.
In an e-mail message, James D. Jordan, president and director of Columbia University Press, told The Chronicle today that he had tendered his resignation from the Executive Council of the AAP’s Professional and Scholarly Publishing division on August 28, five days after Prism was announced. A task force of the Executive Council put the campaign together.
“I resigned from the Executive Council because I did not feel that serving at this time was the best use of my time or Columbia resources,” Mr. Jordan wrote, “and because I had vocally opposed the launch of the Prism Web site and did not subscribe to arguments supporting it and opposing the NIH’s public-access proposals.” (The National Institutes of Health’s PubMed Central, a service of the National Library of Medicine, is a key venue of the open-access movement.)
Mr. Jordan said that his press remained “a member of PSP and the AAP, as both associations serve important educational missions for the scholarly-publishing community even though we do not always agree with every majority view of such a diverse community.”
Another university-press leader, Stephen Bourne, chief executive officer of Cambridge University Press, has also made clear his displeasure about Prism. In an e-mail message to The Chronicle, he wrote that Cambridge “has in no way been involved in, or consulted on, the Prism initiative.” He added that “Prism’s message is oversimplistic and ill-judged, with the unwelcome consequence of creating tension between the publishing community and the proponents of open access.” —Jennifer Howard
Posted on Tuesday September 11, 2007 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Judge Orders Iran to Pay $13-Million for Terrorist Bombing That Killed Student
Next: Group Renews Attacks on Social-Work Programs as 'Inherently Liberal'
I’m surprised that the government insists on open access. Just think of some local screwball being able to get access to the Journal of Agricultural Science AND the Journal of British Pharmacology? Jeez, the next thing you know, he’s mixing fertilizer and hydrogen peroxide and the next thing you know, the terrorists have won.
— marci Sep 11, 06:24 PM #
marci, We laugh, but some of the publishers actually made that argument.
— a. nonimus Sep 11, 08:16 PM #
The publishing business is highly competitive. Publishing houses select manuscripts that will bring in profits. Providing open access is simply one way to include value-added services.
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Editor-in-Chief
NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS
www.nationalforum.com
— William Allan Kritsonis, PhD Sep 12, 12:23 PM #
William- What does that mean exactly? Are you making a case one way or the other?
— ethan Sep 12, 08:03 PM #