The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"As Supreme Court opinions have stated, affirmative action is not intended to be a permanent fixture in America. Personally, I look forward to living in a country where people are rewarded on their deeds instead of their pigmentation."
— EC

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action

Recent Posts

Washington State Court Says Campus Police Officers Lack Authority to Patrol Dorms

Saint Louis U. to Pay $1-Million to Settle Overbilling Allegations

West Virginia U. Hires Former Chief of Land-Grant Association as Its Interim President

Wedding Bells Ring for Scholars of Genocide and Irrationality

Senate Panel Approves Bill With Big Increase for Energy Research


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 86

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges | 30

Provost of North Carolina State U. Defends Big Raise for Governor's Wife | 29

Lender Jeered as It Departs Federal Student-Loan Program | 27

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action | 23

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

September 9, 2007

Dartmouth Expands Board, Reducing Role of Alumni Elections

The Dartmouth College Board of Trustees voted on Saturday to expand to 26 members, adding eight new trustees, the college announced. The board will continue holding alumni elections for eight alumni-trustee slots, but those trustees will hold a smaller share of seats on the board. All other trustees are appointed by the board itself, except for the state’s governor and college’s president, who are both ex officio members.

“Given the divisiveness of recent elections, we did not believe that having more elections would be good for Dartmouth,” Charles E. Haldeman Jr., the board’s chairman, said in a written statement. “We also believe that the board needs more trustees selected for the specific talents and experiences they can offer the college — which elections can’t guarantee.”

Dartmouth’s alumni elections have attained a remarkably high profile in recent years, drawing attention from the national news media and organizations such as the American Council of Trustees and Alumni. In the weeks before the board’s planned governance overhaul this weekend, an alumni group bought $300,000 worth of newspaper advertisements to argue against a diminished role for elected trustees, a position The Wall Street Journal echoed in an editorial.

In his statement Mr. Haldeman predicted criticism of the governance changes, which he said “address the destructive politicization of trustee campaigns.” Within hours bloggers were denouncing the board’s decision, with the prominent blog Power Line dubbing it “Dartmouth’s Disgrace.” —Paul Fain

Posted on Sunday September 9, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. Darmmouth has a long standing reputation for ethics, quality, and tradition. Hopefully the changes taking place ensure the quality of education students receive at Darmouth.

    William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
    Editor-in-Chief
    NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS
    www.nationalforum.com

    — William Allan Kritsonis, PhD    Sep 10, 08:37 AM    #

  2. Noisy minorities will continue to try to politicize higher education – more than it already is. It is fortunate that Dartmouth has the power and the will to stem this particular tide.

    — dave    Sep 10, 08:46 AM    #

  3. The real question for William Allan Kritsonis—and one whose answer we are all anxiously awaiting—is whether the highest standards of integrity and ethical standards ought to prevail in this case.

    — Gustave    Sep 10, 12:10 PM    #

  4. On a more serious note, though, the Dartmouth board’s action calls to mind the old slogan of 1960s radicals, “If Voting Changed Anything, They’d Abolish It.” It did, and they have.

    — Gustave    Sep 10, 03:57 PM    #

  5. Perhaps Dartmouth does have “the power and will to stem this particular tide,” but the board will have no one to blame but itself if alumni participation (and financial support) wanes as a result of this end-run around democracy.

    I wonder if Dave in comment 2 is as dismissive of “noisy minorities” when they are groups such as gays & lesbians, anarchists, anti-globalists, radical nationalists, and other favored groups of the academic left.

    — J. Ward    Sep 10, 06:27 PM    #