The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Many, many years ago one of my English TA officemates noticed that a student wrote 'writhing' instead of 'writing.' We spent the rest of the afternoon inserting 'writhing' into textbook titles ('Writhing with a Purpose') and other phrases like 'technical writhing.' My favorite: 'writhing across the curriculum.'” --peg

Herding the 'Escape Goats': Contest Sends Up Epidemic of Student Howlers

Recent Posts

Visa Delay Keeps Bangladeshi Scholar From Taking Post in Oklahoma

North Carolina A&T State U. Earns NSF Grant for Engineering Research

College of William and Mary Hires Interim Chief as President

Cuomo Reported to Be Planning New Student-Loan Lawsuit and Agreements

Southern Cal Deletes Muslim Scripture From Web Site Following Complaint


Most Commented This Month

Palin Attended 4 Colleges in 5 Years to Earn Diploma | 191

Professor Suspects UCLA Is Illegally Using Race in Admissions Decisions | 40

Cutthroat Competition for Textbook Sales Pits UMass Faculty Members Against Bookstore | 39

Southern Cal Deletes Muslim Scripture From Web Site Following Complaint | 33

British Publisher Will Release Controversial Novel About Muhammad's Bride | 18

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

September 7, 2007

House Passes Broad Patent-Reform Bill With Most Provisions Sought by Colleges

The U.S. House of Representatives approved a major bill today to alter patent law after agreeing to several amendments, including a few that were high on the agenda for colleges.

Still, passage of the bill, HR 1908, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, will not end the lobbying. Rather, it will now shift to the Senate, where companion legislation, S 1145, with some different provisions, has been passed by the Judiciary Committee but has yet to reach the Senate floor.

The House bill includes many provisions that higher-education associations say will improve the nation’s economic competitiveness. It also incorporates changes sought by colleges to allow academics to continue to publish their findings without jeopardizing their rights to patent them.

During debate on Friday, lawmakers also agreed to another change urged by higher-education officials. It would eliminate a proposal that would have expanded the rights of companies to claim “prior user rights” as a defense against infringement lawsuits. Universities had been concerned that such a change would have undercut their ability to enforce patents, because companies could claim that they were within their rights to use the patented inventions by claiming that they had been developed as “trade secrets.”

But the legislation adopted today, by a vote of 220 to 175, still contains a provision, opposed by college lobbyists, that would change how damages are awarded in infringement lawsuits. Higher-education associations made their positions known in a letter sent this week to the House leaders most involved in the debate. —Goldie Blumenstyk

Posted on Friday September 7, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. The provisions contained in the legislation adopted should help to remedy many challenging situations.

    William Allan Kritsonis, PhD

    — William Allan Kritsonis, PhD    Sep 10, 08:38 AM    #