|
|
In the Comments
"We don’t vote for grownups in Muskogee,
Recent Posts
New York Court Reduces Damages in Suit Against Union College A Union College alumna who two years ago successfully sued the college for $16-million after stepping into an open manhole saw an appeals court slash her award to $4.1-million. Foreign Business Schools Retreating From China Schools cite red tape, lack of interest, and poor language skills. Senate Bill Supports Veterans' Benefits, $1.2-Billion for Science The increase would help flat budgets at the NIH and NSF, but President Bush vows a veto. Australia Nearly Doubles Endowment for University Infrastructure The increase is designed to restore funds cut under a previous administration. Top Official in Education Dept. to Lead Business-School Consortium Diane Auer Jones, the assistant secretary for postsecondary education, will become president of the Washington Campus. Comment [4]
Most Commented This Month
Cal State Instructor Fired for Refusing to Sign Loyalty Oath | 74 Princeton U. Press Recalls Typo-Filled Book and Says It Will Reprint | 59 U. of Colorado at Boulder Wants to Hire 'Professor of Conservative Thought' | 57 Roman Catholic College Disinvites Pro-Choice Speaker | 47 U. of Florida Plans Layoffs and Enrollment Cuts as State Funds Fall | 45
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search June 28, 2007NSF Urged to Support 'Transformative' Research With Promise of BreakthroughsSeven years after the National Science Foundation said it was trying to finance more “high risk” projects at the cutting edge of research, instead of “sure thing” projects that promised only incremental advances, the National Science Board seems to think the foundation is not trying hard enough. In a new report, the board, the NSF’s governing body, urges the foundation to refocus its grant making on “transformative” research and to dispel the perception among scientists that only grant proposals with conservative objectives will gain a positive hearing. —Andrew Mytelka Posted on Thursday June 28, 2007 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Immigration Bill Dies in Senate, Dooming Provisions on Tuition and College Students
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
I applaud the NSF-Board’s decision because the recent impression by my colleagues and I is that precisely what the Board criticizes is happening. That is, NSF Reviewers want proposals that almost completely solve the problems being proposed for investigation.
— Carlos Handy Jun 28, 03:59 PM #
Just more song and dance. Bottom line “rich” labs will stay “rich”, poor labs from less prestiges schools will still not obtain resources. This is will change nothing.
— ROM Jun 28, 05:14 PM #
The NSF has some very sharp program officers. The panels try hard, but group decisions are very likely to be conservative. It would help if the POs were given more flexibility and discretion in funding decisions.
— Herbert J. Bernstein Jun 28, 05:28 PM #