The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We don’t vote for grownups in Muskogee,
We just want a chump at City Hall,
Then we can manipulate the system,
While junior’s havin’ an awesome time and all."
--M. Haggard

Mr. Mayor Is a Freshman

Recent Posts

New York Court Reduces Damages in Suit Against Union College

Foreign Business Schools Retreating From China

Senate Bill Supports Veterans' Benefits, $1.2-Billion for Science

Australia Nearly Doubles Endowment for University Infrastructure

Top Official in Education Dept. to Lead Business-School Consortium


Most Commented This Month

Cal State Instructor Fired for Refusing to Sign Loyalty Oath | 74

Princeton U. Press Recalls Typo-Filled Book and Says It Will Reprint | 59

U. of Colorado at Boulder Wants to Hire 'Professor of Conservative Thought' | 57

Roman Catholic College Disinvites Pro-Choice Speaker | 47

U. of Florida Plans Layoffs and Enrollment Cuts as State Funds Fall | 45

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

June 28, 2007

NSF Urged to Support 'Transformative' Research With Promise of Breakthroughs

Seven years after the National Science Foundation said it was trying to finance more “high risk” projects at the cutting edge of research, instead of “sure thing” projects that promised only incremental advances, the National Science Board seems to think the foundation is not trying hard enough. In a new report, the board, the NSF’s governing body, urges the foundation to refocus its grant making on “transformative” research and to dispel the perception among scientists that only grant proposals with conservative objectives will gain a positive hearing. —Andrew Mytelka

Posted on Thursday June 28, 2007 | Permalink |

Comments

  1. I applaud the NSF-Board’s decision because the recent impression by my colleagues and I is that precisely what the Board criticizes is happening. That is, NSF Reviewers want proposals that almost completely solve the problems being proposed for investigation.

    — Carlos Handy    Jun 28, 03:59 PM    #

  2. Just more song and dance. Bottom line “rich” labs will stay “rich”, poor labs from less prestiges schools will still not obtain resources. This is will change nothing.

    — ROM    Jun 28, 05:14 PM    #

  3. The NSF has some very sharp program officers. The panels try hard, but group decisions are very likely to be conservative. It would help if the POs were given more flexibility and discretion in funding decisions.

    — Herbert J. Bernstein    Jun 28, 05:28 PM    #