The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We don’t vote for grownups in Muskogee,
We just want a chump at City Hall,
Then we can manipulate the system,
While junior’s havin’ an awesome time and all."
--M. Haggard

Mr. Mayor Is a Freshman

Recent Posts

Top Official in Education Dept. to Lead Business-School Consortium

GAO Report Says Community Colleges Are Crucial in Training the Work Force

Academic Capital Flows: U. of Chicago Plans $200-Million Milton Friedman Institute

Medical School for Physician-Scientists Will Offer Free Tuition

Study Finds Varying Community-College Enrollments Among States


Most Commented This Month

Cal State Instructor Fired for Refusing to Sign Loyalty Oath | 74

Princeton U. Press Recalls Typo-Filled Book and Says It Will Reprint | 57

U. of Colorado at Boulder Wants to Hire 'Professor of Conservative Thought' | 57

Roman Catholic College Disinvites Pro-Choice Speaker | 47

U. of Florida Plans Layoffs and Enrollment Cuts as State Funds Fall | 44

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

June 7, 2007

Affirmative Action's Foes Call for Ban on Preferences in Immigration Bill

Critics of affirmative action plan to publish an open letter tomorrow calling for any immigration bill passed by Congress to contain language barring newly naturalized citizens from receiving preferences based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or color.

The open letter, scheduled for publication in The Washington Times, argues that “immigration and race preferences cannot be considered in isolation,” and that it is unfair that “the majority of immigrants coming to America will automatically be eligible for race preferences and privileges not provided to the great majority of Americans.”

The letter bears the signatures of 26 local and national leaders of the movement to bar the use of affirmative-action preferences in education, employment, and contracting. The effort to get it published was led by Ward Connerly, chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute and a leader of successful campaigns in California, Michigan, and Washington to ban affirmative-action preferences at public colleges and other state and local agencies. He has announced plans to get similar measures on the ballot in at least five other states.

The immigration bill faces an uncertain future after failing to pick up sufficient support in a test vote this afternoon in the Senate, the Associated Press reported. The Senate is continuing to debate the legislation, however. —Peter Schmidt

Posted on Thursday June 7, 2007 | Permalink |