|
|
In the Comments
"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says
Recent Posts
More Than 1,100 Colleges Join Yellow Ribbon Program for Military Veterans A total of 1,165 colleges have signed up for a federal effort to help military veterans attend college. Comment [1] Record-Setting Jury Verdict Could Mean (More) Profits for NYU New York University’s 2007 patent-royalty sale anticipated the potential for further payments. Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges Speaking at a Unesco conference in Paris, the vice president’s wife stressed the importance of two-year institutions to the nation’s educational goals. Comment [12] Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement Administrators are scrambling to plug holes in their course schedules for fall, with most expecting to do so by hiring more adjuncts or increasing class sizes. Comment [20] U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show The two were among five with houses on property where the university plans to build new academic facilities. Comment [2]
Most Commented This Month
College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58 President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58 Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57 Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57 North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search April 24, 2007Congress Might Face Continued Pork-Free Diet in 2008, Key Lawmaker SaysThe U.S. House of Representatives might extend this year’s moratorium on Congressional earmarks for a second year, under a plan being considered by the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Rep. David R. Obey, Congress Daily AM reported today (subscription required). Mr. Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat, had pledged to cut in half the number of earmarks contained in previous years’ appropriations bills, written by Republicans who went on a spree of pork-barrel spending. Democratic leaders nixed most earmarks for 2007, saying they wanted to increase the transparency and accountability of the controversial, noncompetitive awards, many of which go to academe. Even though Congress made those changes, earmarking was expected to resume in the 2008 fiscal year, which begins on October 1, and Mr. Obey’s committee has been accepting written requests for earmarks from House members. In the Congress Daily report, Mr. Obey did not state a reason for considering extending the no-pork diet. He said only that “I can’t tell you if we’re going to have earmarks or not until I see what the hell they look like, until I see what mood the House is in, what mood the Senate is in.” So far, his Senate colleagues have shown no signs of a diminished appetite for the other white meat. —Jeffrey Brainard Posted on Tuesday April 24, 2007 | Permalink |
Previous: Something Is Rotten in the State of Shakespeare Requirements, Report Says
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||