|
|
In the Comments
"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering." NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams
Recent Posts
U. of Nevada at Reno, Facing Dozens of Lawsuits, Spends Big on Outside Legal Help The university, which says most of the complaints are meritless, has spent about $1.7-million on lawyers to help in just four of the cases. Canadian Panel to Investigate University's Halting of Controversial Research The university had approved a study of assisted suicides, but changed its mind after getting legal opinions. Dispute Over Academic Freedom Roils Turkish-Studies Institute Some scholars say the Turkish government, which supports the center, forced a former board chairman to resign because of his published views on the massacre of Armenians in 1915. U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges In a statement released today by the university, Stephen G. Jennings acknowledged making “a very serious mistake” and apologized. Comment [9] Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action The backers of a similar measure in Colorado filed petitions months ago, but legal challenges may complicate such campaigns. Comment [22]
Most Commented This Month
Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88 ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77 Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61 U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49 Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47
By Category
Athletics
Blog Archives
Keep Up to Date
Today's most e-mailed
Prior days' news: By date | Search This week's print issue Back issues: By date | Search March 1, 2007Long Island U. Settles With Students in Case Involving a Rubber-Duck HostageThe C.W. Post campus of Long Island University has settled a $2.5-million lawsuit filed by five students who contended that the private university had wrongfully fired them as resident assistants because they made a video alleged to be offensive to Muslims, the Student Press Law Center reported. Details of the settlement were not released. The case arose last month, when the students were fired from posts as resident assistants after a video they made spoofing a hostage situation appeared on the Internet. During the two-minute video, four of the students appear in ski masks holding a rubber duck as “hostage.” The students later apologized, saying they had not intended to offend Muslims. Posted on Thursday March 1, 2007 | Permalink |Comments
Previous: Expense Records for Pennsylvania Student-Loan Agency Reveal Caribbean Stays, Pricey Restaurant Meals
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Are rubber ducks sacred to Muslims? Or is this another campus run by cowards who cave to pressure?
— Sheldon Mar 2, 08:45 AM #
Of course Sheldon is right. Ducks are sacred 2 muslims. LIU is run by pressure caving cowards. And may I add, all LIU-RAs R boneheads.
— Jo-Jo Mar 2, 12:45 PM #
Is this offensive to all Muslims, or just terrorists who happen to be Muslim? If the latter, and assuming the answer to Sheldon’s first question is “no”, is LIU caving to pressure from terrorists because they’re alumni and, ergo, potential donors?
— EG Mar 2, 11:17 PM #
It seems the only people to be offended should be ski mask-wearing hostage-takers, and perhaps, to a lesser degree, PETA. I fail to see where Muslims come into the picture.
— Hawk Mar 5, 12:14 PM #
The Student Press Law Center article (linked in the above item) says “They make ransom demands in broken English while Middle Eastern-sounding music is played in the background, and the words ‘Muhammad’ and ‘jihad’ are heard.”
So that’s how Muslims come into the picture. It’s not quite such a case of hypersensitivity as portrayed here. One can still say, however, that the proper answer to free speech, however stupid or offensive, is more speech, not censorship and punishment.
— Swish Mar 13, 02:27 PM #