The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all.
— Debbie C

Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors

Recent Posts

Education Department's 'Emergency' Request for Pell Grant Survey Is Denied

Accreditor Can Certify New Institutions Once Again, Education Dept. Says

NYU's President to Teach at Incipient Campus in United Arab Emirates

Judge Rules That UC-Berkeley May Build Controversial Athletics Center

Student-Aid Administrators Worry About Access to Loans, Survey Finds


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104

Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92

Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59

College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54

Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

February 7, 2007

Cell-Biology Journal Embraces Open Access and Says It Still Makes Money

Scientific journals can be made freely available to the public and still make money, says Gary Ward, treasurer of the American Society for Cell Biology. For the past six years, the society has made reports published in its monthly research journal, Molecular Biology of the Cell, available online to nonsubscribers two months after publication. The journal has not only remained financially sound but also continues to generate profits while following an open-access business model, the society reports. Those profits help pay for educational, career-development, and public-policy programs, including continued support of efforts to require the results of biomedical research financed with federal money to be made freely accessible no more than six months after they are published.

The push for open access has led many scholarly associations to fear that the free release of research findings would undermine the business models of their journals, which often are key sources of revenue for entire associations. While some societies seem open to the idea of open access, it’s unclear if it can be fashioned into a viable business model. And some publishers, dead-set against open access, have fired back by hiring an aggressive public-relations firm to fight off the movement.

Posted on Wednesday February 7, 2007 | Permalink |