The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Some college administrators seem so distracted with fund raising, academic infighting, and community initiatives that they set up their emergency communications departments very poorly. Training is poor to nonexistent, secretaries are pressed into service with tremendous responsibilities for running 'notification systems' 24/7 and on weekends because no one else knows how to do it and the administration won’t pay for additional staff. Procedures are seat-of-the-pants and dependent on HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion), except when something like Virginia Tech happens and there is some sort of scramble to do something different." --Donna

Most Colleges Avoid Risk Management, Report Says

Recent Posts

Jill Biden Shines a Global Spotlight on American Community Colleges

Connecticut Public Colleges Lose 200 Professors to Early Retirement

U. of Georgia Paid 2 Fraternities $2.4-Million to Relocate, Contracts Show

New Allegations in Admissions Controversy at U. of Illinois Suggest Ex-Provost Played a Role

Sonoma State U. Foundation May Lose $350,000 on Loan to Former Board Member


Most Commented This Month

College Suspends Student for Working in Gay Pornography | 58

President Obama's Visit to Notre Dame Carries Barely a Hint of Controversy That Preceded It | 58

Drug Sting Nabs 21 Students at U. of Illinois | 57

Faculty Members and Union Protest Staff Layoffs at Temple U. as 'Cruel' | 57

North Dakota Board's Vote Puts 'Fighting Sioux' Mascot on Thinner Ice | 57

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

February 2, 2007

U. of Michigan Settles Decade-Old Lawsuit Over Admissions Preferences

The lawsuit that led the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the University of Michigan’s point-based system of undergraduate admissions preferences for certain minority groups was settled this week. According to The Ann Arbor News, the university agreed to pay $10,000 to each of the two white plaintiffs who sued in 1997 on the grounds that the university’s admissions system discriminated against them. In a 2003 ruling, the Supreme Court found the preferences to be unconstitutional and ordered the case returned to a lower court for proceedings to determine what damages the plaintiffs were entitled to. Under this week’s deal, which a judge approved on Wednesday, the plaintiffs — Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher — agreed to drop their claims against the university.

The deal also decertifies the case as a class action, potentially sparing the university an onslaught of lawsuits by thousands of other white students who were denied admission while the point-based system was in place.

Quite a lot has changed on the affirmative-action front since 2003. At the same time it struck down the undergraduate-admissions system, the Supreme Court ruled in a separate case that the Michigan law school’s form of affirmative action was acceptable, a decision that made it appear that the practice had won new life. But Michigan voters last fall overwhelmingly approved a new constitutional amendment that bars all affirmative-action preferences in public higher education, and the University of Michigan says it is complying with the measure. Among the leaders of the campaign to enact that amendment was Ms. Gratz.

Posted on Friday February 2, 2007 | Permalink |