The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"Measuring graduation rates is indeed a charade. Yes, some programs have a “respectable” rate of graduating athletes, but these grads often take gut courses, major in fields that have little academic rigor (coaching, general studies), and are placed in courses taught by profs who wouldn’t recognize an academic standard if it slept in their bed. The whole enterprise ought to be called academic gerrymandering."
—Gary

NCAA Imposes Stiffer Penalties for Academic Performance of Midlevel Division I Teams

Recent Posts

U. of Nevada at Reno, Facing Dozens of Lawsuits, Spends Big on Outside Legal Help

Canadian Panel to Investigate University's Halting of Controversial Research

Dispute Over Academic Freedom Roils Turkish-Studies Institute

U. of Evansville President Arrested on Drunken-Driving Charges

Petitions Are Filed for Arizona and Nebraska Referenda on Affirmative Action


Most Commented This Month

Darwin Defeated in the Bayou: Louisiana Encourages 'Critical Thinking' About Evolution | 88

ACLU Complains About Noon-Meal Prayers at Naval Academy | 77

Columbia U. Fires Teachers College Professor Accused of Rampant Plagiarism | 61

U. of Phoenix's Report on Students' Progress Is 'Disingenuous,' Critic Says | 49

Student Who Died at Professor's Home Suffered a Drug Overdose | 47

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

January 23, 2007

U. of Phoenix Appeals to Supreme Court in Lawsuit Over Alleged Recruiter Payoffs

The University of Phoenix has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a lower court’s ruling that the institution must go to trial on allegations that it paid recruiters based on the number of students they enrolled. Paying recruiters solely on such a basis is against the law. A lawsuit, filed in 2003 by two former recruiters, alleges that Phoenix obtained federal funds while certifying that it was in compliance with all Department of Education regulations.

The case, filed under the federal False Claims Act, was dismissed in 2004 by a U.S. District Court in California on technical grounds. It was reinstated in September by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Lawyers for the recruiters say that Phoenix could be forced to repay billions of dollars in federal funds if it loses. The university, which is owned by the Apollo Group, appealed to the full Ninth Circuit, but it declined to hear the case.

Apollo has hired Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general, to argue its side. In a petition to the Supreme Court filed on Monday, Phoenix argues that the decision by the Ninth Circuit is inconsistent with decisions in similar cases by at least three of the other federal circuit courts. If the decision is allowed to stand, the Phoenix lawyers argue, it will expose government contractors to “potentially bankrupting liability on the basis of obscure regulatory violations.”

Posted on Tuesday January 23, 2007 | Permalink |