The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"[I] don’t see many job or grad school applications from University of Waikato, but I’ll sure not trust a transcript or diploma from that institution ... who knows what it might mean?” --perplexed

Neo-Nazi Gets University to Pull Master's Thesis on His Views

Recent Posts

Princeton Economist Who Is Strong Bush Critic Wins Nobel Prize

Professor Who Was Fired for Plagiarism Sues Columbia U.

After a 'Shove,' Provost to Take Faculty Post at Washington State U.

Hurricane Ike Caused $710-Million in Damage to University in Texas, Official Says

Higher-Education Groups Want to Watch Over IRS's Questionnaire for Colleges


Most Commented This Month

Palin Attended 4 Colleges in 5 Years to Earn Diploma | 206

Priest Charged With Dealing Drugs out of U. of Illinois Student Center | 56

University Disciplines 4 Students for Hanging Effigy of Barack Obama | 53

Southern Cal Deletes Muslim Scripture From Web Site Following Complaint | 44

Cutthroat Competition for Textbook Sales Pits UMass Faculty Members Against Bookstore | 42

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

December 23, 2006

Academic Pork Won't Vanish in 2007, Says Report on Democratic Plan

The announcement last week that Congress’s new Democratic majority would eliminate most academic earmarks raised concerns about lost funds among recipients of the Congressionally directed grants, but now it appears that some of the worries were premature.

The Democrats’ plan was part of efforts by the incoming chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees to deal with budget bills left unfinished by the departing Republican Congress. The chairmen said they would seek to freeze spending at 2006 levels for the current 2007 fiscal year for all agencies but the Defense and Homeland Security Departments, whose spending bills were enacted into law.

But as The New York Times reported today, the moratorium on earmarks is likely to affect only efforts to land new pieces of pork. Many earmarks are for projects that go on for years, so their 2006 appropriations are likely to continue as well. And even if Congress does drop the specific language ordering federal agencies to dole out money to favored recipients, the agencies are likely to intuit the wishes of their Congressional overseers and allocate the funds as intended.

Moreover, since a large proportion of academic earmarks are financed through the Pentagon — as much as one-third of the total — those pork-barrel projects will not be affected by the earmark moratorium at all.

Posted on Saturday December 23, 2006 | Permalink |