The Chronicle of Higher Education
News Blog
In the Comments

"We'd like to think that doctors are somehow immune to the influence of advertising, but turns out they're human after all.
— Debbie C

Drug-Company Association Bans Freebies for Doctors

Recent Posts

Education Department's 'Emergency' Request for Pell Grant Survey Is Denied

Accreditor Can Certify New Institutions Once Again, Education Dept. Says

NYU's President to Teach at Incipient Campus in United Arab Emirates

Judge Rules That UC-Berkeley May Build Controversial Athletics Center

Student-Aid Administrators Worry About Access to Loans, Survey Finds


Most Commented This Month

Closed Out? Norman Finkelstein, Controversial Scholar Denied Tenure, Can't Find a Job. | 104

Group Argues That Out-of-Class Learning Is Domain of Faculty, Not Student Affairs | 92

Is There a 'Growing Backlash' Against the SAT? | 59

College Settles With Instructor Fired for Teaching Adam and Eve as Myth | 54

Fresh Artistic Controversy Hits Yale U. | 52

By Category

Athletics
Community Colleges
Government & Politics
Information Technology
International
Money & Management
Northern Illinois
Research & Books
Short Subjects
Students
The Faculty

Blog Archives

Search

Keep Up to Date

Daily news blog: RSS  / Atom

Daily news reported by The Chronicle: RSS

Contact us

September 29, 2006

Another University Will Drop Its American Indian Mascot

Northeastern State University, in Oklahoma, plans to stop using its American Indian nickname, the Tulsa World reported today.

The decision followed the Cherokee Nation’s refusal to support the nickname, the “Redmen.”

Thirteen months ago, the NCAA banned 18 institutions from participating in or playing host to postseason events for using what it deemed to be hostile and abusive American Indian imagery (The Chronicle, August 5, 2005). Northeastern was not on the list, but it created a universitywide task force to evaluate whether it should keep its nickname.

Since then, the NCAA has reversed itself for one prominent university (The Chronicle, August 24, 2005), but upheld penalties for several others (The Chronicle, May 1).

Posted on Friday September 29, 2006 | Permalink |