The Chronicle of Higher Education
Today's News
Friday, December 16, 2005

Wikipedia, the Free Online Encyclopedia, Ponders a New Entity: Wikiversity

By ANDREA L. FOSTER

Article tools

Printer
friendly

E-mail
article

Subscribe

Order
reprints
Discuss any Chronicle article in our forums
Latest Headlines
New Mexico State U. President Fires Off New Allegations in Dispute With Professors

Two whose contracts were not renewed by the university, in what they say was a case of discrimination, now say they are also the victims of baseless allegations by the university's president.

U. of Iowa Puts Flood Damage at More Than $230-Million

Professors Cry Foul as Kean U. Increases Required Office Hours

Portfolios Replace Qualifying Exams as Step Toward Dissertations

Robots Hit the Ivies

Commentary

Updating Higher Education's Past: 1940 to 2005


Headlines

Fraud allegations plague South Korean team's landmark research on stem-cell cloning

Massachusetts board takes unprecedented step of overturning dismissal of college president

Tech revival: program helps Dillard U. professors rebuild course materials and raise spirits

Moody's downgrades bond rating for U. of New Orleans but takes Southern U. off "watch list"

State Digest: a merger is abandoned in Maine, and other news from the states

High-school counselors urge College Board to let students take SAT sections separately

Europeans assail rollout of new online format for Test of English as Foreign Language

Australian scholars, beset with plagiarism, inaugurate new journal on academic integrity

. Information Technology
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, ponders a new entity: Wikiversity

.

Fans of Wikipedia, the popular online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, have proposed the creation of Wikiversity, an electronic institution of learning that would be just as open.

It's not clear exactly how extensive Wikiversity would be. Some think it should serve only as a repository for educational materials; others think it should also play host to online courses; and still others want it to offer degrees.

On a Wikiversity Web site, Cormac Lawler, a doctoral candidate in education at the University of Manchester, in England, says the mission of Wikiversity is to use the open-source model -- based on software that anyone is free to modify -- to develop learning materials, teach, conduct research, and publish. Collaborative learning would be stressed, and students themselves could determine course content and activities. Mr. Lawler, who is a lead proponent of Wikiversity, says he wants the project to focus on original research.

The Wikiversity Web site says the proposed enterprise "could become much more than 'yet another university' -- it has the potential for rethinking the mode of education itself, or, at least, for furthering the model of collaborative education."

Wikipedia was started by Jimmy Wales, an Internet entrepreneur, in 2001 and now contains more than 2.5 million entries in 10 languages. The site receives about 2.5 billion hits a month, and has spawned Wikibooks, which offers free open-source textbooks, and Wiktionary, an open-source dictionary, among other creations.

In an online referendum of those involved in Wiki projects, the vote, which ended last month, was 199 to 86 in support of Wikiversity. But the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, which runs Wikipedia and oversees projects that use its software, is on the fence about Wikiversity. And some board members fear the project would be publicly derided.

There has been widespread grumbling about the accuracy of Wikipedia since John Seigenthaler Sr., a former editor of USA Today, publicly complained in that newspaper last month that he had been vilified in a Wikipedia entry. The entry, which has been changed, had falsely linked him to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (The Chronicle, Wired Campus Blog, December 14).

But John W. Schmidt, a neuroscientist who is a research manager at Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine, in Tempe, Ariz., says that Wikiversity might actually improve the credibility of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects by promoting a culture of scholarship, accuracy, and fact-checking.

"I think that could be an important role for Wikiversity," said Mr. Schmidt, "and I'm trying to push that position."

The Wikimedia board last month asked proponents to clarify the project. It decided that Wikiversity would not be a host for online courses or promote itself as a degree-granting institution. But many hope the board will eventually reconsider its decision about courses. In the meantime, about 15 people have already created online courses on the Wikibooks Web site.



Background article from The Chronicle:

Opinion: