Screw you for going along with the reviewer who said my project had no broader impact because "according to Wikipedia the study site is 94% White." That's not even true about that place. But hey, it saves you the trouble of looking at the percentage of kids on free/reduced lunch (in the proposal), or looking at the demographics of the second population to be serviced (in the proposal). Here's an idea: Try reading the proposals instead of Wikipedia.
Also, stop telling us this process is a pure meritocracy. It's not an actual meritocracy. Screw you.
Love and giggles,
I mean, I would say this, but no one would care.