• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 11:26:36 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: Talk online about your experiences as an adjunct, visiting assistant professor, postdoc, or other contract faculty member.
 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Collaboration Really Seen This Way in the Humanities?  (Read 10561 times)
dolljepopp
a "liberal neo-monarchist"
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 3,901

So 'ne Driss...


« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2012, 06:19:58 PM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...
Logged

"Double standards are the warning signals of a free society." - Timothy Garton Ash
merinoblue
Zep-loving party girl and
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,878


« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2012, 06:47:10 PM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.
Logged

Sometimes I can start a party; sometimes I can't.
mouseman
Oh dear, how did I become a
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 7,103

The Validater/Validator-in-Chief


« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2012, 12:50:43 AM »

Evidently this article has 2512 authors.  That would make the mass sex scene in Eyes Wide Shut look like a two teenage couples making out in the same car.
Logged

In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
In the midst of his laughter and glee,
He had softly and suddenly vanished away -- -
For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.
                                                  Lewis Carroll
fiona
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 11,521


« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2012, 01:11:52 AM »

Golly. If that's a federal problem, does that mean Interpol (or someone worse) is looking at those who collaborate internationally?

Can we do Interpole dancing? What do we wear? Do we coordinate our parts?

The Fiona
Logged

The Fiona or perhaps La Fiona
Professor of Thread Killing, Fiork University

The Right Reverend Fiona, PhD, Bishop of the Fora
crumpet
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,313


« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2012, 04:36:04 AM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Word.
Logged
madhatter
We proudly present the fora's Least
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,675

Just killing time


« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2012, 11:46:04 AM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.

Hmm, sounds like a research topic. Saaay, merinoblue, meet me in the lab for some hot, guilt-free meta-analysis. I'll bring SPSS; you bring the red wine.
Logged

"I may be an evil scientist, but it doesn't take a degree purchased from the Internet with your ex-wife's money to know how special and important you are to me." -- Dr. Doofenschmirtz
merinoblue
Zep-loving party girl and
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,878


« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2012, 11:56:19 AM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.

Hmm, sounds like a research topic. Saaay, merinoblue, meet me in the lab for some hot, guilt-free meta-analysis. I'll bring SPSS; you bring the red wine.

Well, now: I like to know a little something about who I might jump into bed with before I begin collaborating.  Does your lab website have photos of its members with a description of their, ahem, research expertise?  Do they use mixed methods?
Logged

Sometimes I can start a party; sometimes I can't.
madhatter
We proudly present the fora's Least
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,675

Just killing time


« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2012, 12:25:51 PM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.

Hmm, sounds like a research topic. Saaay, merinoblue, meet me in the lab for some hot, guilt-free meta-analysis. I'll bring SPSS; you bring the red wine.

Well, now: I like to know a little something about who I might jump into bed with before I begin collaborating.  Does your lab website have photos of its members with a description of their, ahem, research expertise?  Do they use mixed methods?

We are purely quantitative, but I guarantee you'll be impressed by the size of our confidence intervals.
Logged

"I may be an evil scientist, but it doesn't take a degree purchased from the Internet with your ex-wife's money to know how special and important you are to me." -- Dr. Doofenschmirtz
merinoblue
Zep-loving party girl and
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,878


« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2012, 12:28:49 PM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.

Hmm, sounds like a research topic. Saaay, merinoblue, meet me in the lab for some hot, guilt-free meta-analysis. I'll bring SPSS; you bring the red wine.

Well, now: I like to know a little something about who I might jump into bed with before I begin collaborating.  Does your lab website have photos of its members with a description of their, ahem, research expertise?  Do they use mixed methods?

We are purely quantitative, but I guarantee you'll be impressed by the size of our confidence intervals.

Wow!  I like the sound of this.  But I've never worked with purely quantitative collaborators before, so I hope you won't overwhelm me with your tools the first time in.
Logged

Sometimes I can start a party; sometimes I can't.
madhatter
We proudly present the fora's Least
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,675

Just killing time


« Reply #39 on: January 23, 2012, 03:58:32 PM »

I do most of my publishing now in academic medicine journals, where long strings of co-authors is the norm. I can only assume that means we are having orgies.

Sigh.

Yet more evidence I am in the wrong field...

Madhatter didn't say they were good orgies.  We should consider the quality of collaboration, not just the frequency of opportunities or the number of participants.

Hmm, sounds like a research topic. Saaay, merinoblue, meet me in the lab for some hot, guilt-free meta-analysis. I'll bring SPSS; you bring the red wine.

Well, now: I like to know a little something about who I might jump into bed with before I begin collaborating.  Does your lab website have photos of its members with a description of their, ahem, research expertise?  Do they use mixed methods?

We are purely quantitative, but I guarantee you'll be impressed by the size of our confidence intervals.

Wow!  I like the sound of this.  But I've never worked with purely quantitative collaborators before, so I hope you won't overwhelm me with your tools the first time in.

Let's get our freak on APA style!
Logged

"I may be an evil scientist, but it doesn't take a degree purchased from the Internet with your ex-wife's money to know how special and important you are to me." -- Dr. Doofenschmirtz
donstefano
Senior member
****
Posts: 818


« Reply #40 on: January 24, 2012, 03:22:47 AM »

Evidently this article has 2512 authors.  That would make the mass sex scene in Eyes Wide Shut look like a two teenage couples making out in the same car.

Authors 2475 to 2511 are junior researchers in charge of maintaining the author mailinglist, and checking correct spellings of each author's name. 2466 to 2474 are the 8 coordinators of these juniors, one for each research group. 2465 is a professional mediator hired to solve authorship quarrels. 
Logged
jackofallchem
Senior member
****
Posts: 554


« Reply #41 on: January 27, 2012, 01:15:30 PM »

Evidently this article has 2512 authors.  That would make the mass sex scene in Eyes Wide Shut look like a two teenage couples making out in the same car.
If this were true, wouldn't more students be trying to major in physics?
Logged

Anything you do not understand is magic.
merinoblue
Zep-loving party girl and
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,878


« Reply #42 on: January 27, 2012, 01:23:30 PM »

Evidently this article has 2512 authors.  That would make the mass sex scene in Eyes Wide Shut look like a two teenage couples making out in the same car.
If this were true, wouldn't more students be trying to major in physics?

It might give the expression, "Math is hard!" a whole new meaning.
Logged

Sometimes I can start a party; sometimes I can't.
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!