next »

[kosovo]

I've been asked to serve as an outside reader on a UK dissertation committee.  The defense is coming up in the spring and I wonder if there are any particular differences between a US and a British oral defense?  What is expected of examiners during the oral defense that would be different from what would take place in a US university?  The British university is a top-tier university, if that matters.

[seniorscholar]

Unless things have changed since I defended, the first shock for a US person defending at a UK university was that my supervisor was not even in the room: just me and two examiners, both strangers to me. And it was certainly more adversarial than the US defenses I've been part of in the years since, though I didn't realize it then.

And worst of all, it was timed so that the pubs had just closed when it was over -- are any of the UK readers old enough to remember that afternoon dry spell? However, a friend met me outside with a bottle in her market basket, and it taught me to smuggle a couple of bottles of champagne into the seminar room on my campus when my own candidates are defending, for drinking before we all adjourn to the bar across from campus.

[hegemony]

In the UK the defense is not just a formality, as in the US.  People can be failed at the defense.  It doesn't happen that often, but it's a possibility.  So the defense should be a genuine inquiry into the dissertation and whether it holds up, not just a run-through of the issues.

[babbinacara]

You should expect a genuine discussion among three scholars (one obviously junior). You should have a list of Qs to ask but also be prepared to bounce off from your co-examiner's questions or things the examinee says.

Your Qs should be multi-scale, from 'why did you choose method x rather than y?' through 'have you read A's work on the topic, relevant to your section 2.5, and what do you think of it?' to 'do you really mean 'emulation' when 'imitation' might have been a better word on page 137?'

You should have decided independently before you go in to the defense whether your think the work is a pass or fail, and if a pass, whether it is to be passed straight away or needs some corrections/ amendments.  These can be as minor as typos through adding a section on A's work to rewriting a chapter. The defense usually doesn't change that decision but can amend it somewhat, especially since the final outcome will be a joint decision between you and the co-examiner.

It should be enjoyable, since it should be a discussion about a topic or piece of research you find interesting, what the student has done on it and what s/he might do next. It can, of course, be painful, especially if the student is extremely nervous, arrogant or dumb. (No difference from US oral defenses there, then.)