• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 08:03:28 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: For all you tweeters, follow The Chronicle on Twitter.
 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: HE in the news... UCU ballot and dry run at 'impact'  (Read 7954 times)
anon_expat
New member
*
Posts: 34


« on: January 20, 2011, 08:24:32 AM »

Thoughts?

UCU ballot on strikes:
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=414899&c=1

Impact:
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=414898&c=1
Logged
tinyzombie
She of the Ass-Kicking Socks, and a
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 7,439

elevate from this point on - chuck d


« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2011, 12:05:56 PM »

I thought this thread was going to be about the Hamster Emeritus.

/derail
Logged

Quote from: _god_
Correct, as usual, TZ.
Quote from: cc_alan
That's because you are not Dude. TZ, however, is Dude.
Quote from: hipgeek
TZ is my favorite.
Quote from: anthroid
I wish YOU began with A.
the_walrus
Senior member
****
Posts: 401


« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2011, 09:24:20 AM »

Anyone willing to say whether they voted for strike action or not?  I did, ever so reluctantly.  I don't trust the union one bit not to screw everything up entirely, from making us go on strike and then coming away with exactly the first offer given by the unis, to just plain losing the ballots, but I trust uni management even less.
Logged
anon_expat
New member
*
Posts: 34


« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2011, 10:16:07 AM »

I did too, hesitantly. It seems that if it is not on the table as a bargaining tactic, then things will not go anywhere though I hope strike action is ultimately unnecessary.

Those vice chancellors can ignore the conversation with the comfort of their posh benefits otherwise:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8288605/Vice-chancellors-receive-up-to-40000-in-benefits.html
Logged
anon_expat
New member
*
Posts: 34


« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2011, 05:58:02 AM »

Anyone else have mildly threatening letters sent out threatening staff that might strike next week? Or would 'breach of contract' letters from the centre be expected?
Logged
drspouse
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,151


WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2011, 11:09:25 AM »

Yes, mildly threatening here in our weekly roundup - salary to be docked - but that is normal I feel.

What is slightly surprising is that we took part in ASS (action short of a strike, but I like the TLA much better!) a few years ago and the letter we got this week implies that we should have lost about 6 weeks' pay during that action, I do not recall that we did.
Logged
the_walrus
Senior member
****
Posts: 401


« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2011, 12:03:16 PM »

I hesitate to be optimistic about anything related to the union, but this really does seem rather promising:

http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=5397&from=1676
Logged
observer3
Senior member
****
Posts: 430


« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2011, 05:58:14 AM »

That is a useful link!

The Union is all we have - without them we are screwed. And luckily the types that try to use it for foreign policy purposes are quiet now because the tasks that the union is actually for - work conditions - are so pressing.
Logged
qrypt
Qryptacular & not really a Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,439

the great vampire squid round the face of humanity


« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2011, 07:13:42 AM »

That is a useful link!

The Union is all we have - without them we are screwed. And luckily the types that try to use it for foreign policy purposes are quiet now because the tasks that the union is actually for - work conditions - are so pressing.

My experience has been that *with* them we are screwed -- though I concede that it's a matter for debate as to whether we are more screwed with them. 
Logged

"I'm tired of being your love slave!"

"Does that mean I'm not going to get my coffee?"
drspouse
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,151


WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2011, 06:39:32 PM »

Hard to tell, since we have not run a double blind placebo controlled trial.

Anyway, I'm going to try hard not to die tomorrow (won't say exactly why but some of you may have seen a UCU news item).
Logged
wegie
Unemployed & unemployable
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 9,816


« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2011, 06:32:51 AM »

Anyway, I'm going to try hard not to die tomorrow (won't say exactly why but some of you may have seen a UCU news item).

<wanders off to UCU website>

<reads article>

<feels vaguely ill>

I suppose it's too much to hope that certain people's cars received a damn good egging on the way in this morning?
Logged
monkeywoman
Junior member
**
Posts: 56


« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2011, 07:34:54 AM »

Anyone else walking the picket line today?
Logged
snape
Senior member
****
Posts: 449


« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2011, 08:03:47 AM »

We are working today, going on strike on Thursday in accordance with a message distributed by our local UCU, which seems to go against the national message.
Logged
expatinuk
Has spent over 1000 pounds but now holds a Brit passport!
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 6,653

From SC living in UK


WWW
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2011, 08:34:30 AM »

I'm probably going to annoy some of you, but I don't see anything wrong with raising the retirement age to 65. I really would like to see any mandatory retirement age eliminated.

There are other issues that are much more important.
Logged

Expatinuk seems to be a Soviet Satellite in stationary orbit over the UK

It is what it is.
qrypt
Qryptacular & not really a Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,439

the great vampire squid round the face of humanity


« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2011, 09:24:27 AM »

I'm probably going to annoy some of you, but I don't see anything wrong with raising the retirement age to 65. I really would like to see any mandatory retirement age eliminated.

There are other issues that are much more important.

I agree with this as well.  In fact I think we'd be in a stronger position to prevent the *really* undesirable changes (inflation cap, higher contributions) if we pushed harder in the direction of a higher retirement age (and indeed abolishing mandatory retirement altogether -- though isn't this supposed to have happened already?).  

I am also not convinced that final-salary is more desirable, particularly as someone who has no aspiration to anything above bog-standard professor.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2011, 09:25:20 AM by qrypt » Logged

"I'm tired of being your love slave!"

"Does that mean I'm not going to get my coffee?"
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!