• Saturday, November 28, 2009
November 28, 2009, 01:06:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: For all you tweeters, follow The Chronicle on Twitter.
 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: 12 minutes of my life down the drain...  (Read 990 times)
mad_doctor
Senior member
****
Posts: 893


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2009, 12:20:42 AM »

I sent an app out once, and received a quick reply (2 - 3 days) to send more documents - letters, transcripts, go online and complete a full app, blah, blah, blah...  So I dutifully spend the afternoon putting everything together and sending it all in.  Two days later I get one of those little form-postcards that informed me the search was over, the candidate was selected, and thanks for applying.  This postcard must have been sent before the request to send more docs and complete a full app.  What a crock!  I have one last thing to say to those people - karma's a b*tch.
Logged
pinkmouse
Member
***
Posts: 157


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2009, 02:04:21 AM »

I sent an app out once, and received a quick reply (2 - 3 days) to send more documents - letters, transcripts, go online and complete a full app, blah, blah, blah...  So I dutifully spend the afternoon putting everything together and sending it all in.  Two days later I get one of those little form-postcards that informed me the search was over, the candidate was selected, and thanks for applying.  This postcard must have been sent before the request to send more docs and complete a full app.  What a crock!  I have one last thing to say to those people - karma's a b*tch.

Did you follow up with a wtf to the search committee member who requested the materials? I can see this happening if HR put you on the wrong list, was still sending out rejection cards for the previous year's search, etc.
Logged
galactic_hedgehog
Procrastinating, Python-quoting, Blue Blazer-drinking, chocolate-chip cookie-eating, Pastafarian, Not So
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 13,653

Known (to some) as "Honeylamb".


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2009, 02:11:35 AM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

You newbies.  Time on the fora is never wasted.
Logged

You are always so straightforward and serious that I know I should never doubt you.

Hedgie loves to read.
scampster
I couldn't think of anything clever to replace my last custom title so I guess I'll just be a plain old
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 3,380


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 05, 2009, 02:18:48 AM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

You newbies.  Time on the fora is never wasted.

Man, I just got depressed looking at my time logged in here: 48:20:48. At least it is a nice looking number.
Logged
barred_owl
Elegant yet understated
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 3,571


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 05, 2009, 02:22:48 AM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

You newbies.  Time on the fora is never wasted.

Man, I just got depressed looking at my time logged in here: 48:20:48. At least it is a nice looking number.

49:23:50   I think I'll pick those numbers to win the Megamillions!  And, heh, I'm 1:03:02 minutes ahead of you, scampster!  Hmmmm...1, 2, 3, 23, 49, 50.   Sounds good for that Megamillions pick.
Logged
scampster
I couldn't think of anything clever to replace my last custom title so I guess I'll just be a plain old
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 3,380


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 05, 2009, 02:24:16 AM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

You newbies.  Time on the fora is never wasted.

Man, I just got depressed looking at my time logged in here: 48:20:48. At least it is a nice looking number.

49:23:50   I think I'll pick those numbers to win the Megamillions!  And, heh, I'm 1:03:02 minutes ahead of you, scampster!  Hmmmm...1, 2, 3, 23, 49, 50.   Sounds good for that Megamillions pick.

Do I get a share?
Logged
mad_doctor
Senior member
****
Posts: 893


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 05, 2009, 08:29:50 AM »

I sent an app out once, and received a quick reply (2 - 3 days) to send more documents - letters, transcripts, go online and complete a full app, blah, blah, blah...  So I dutifully spend the afternoon putting everything together and sending it all in.  Two days later I get one of those little form-postcards that informed me the search was over, the candidate was selected, and thanks for applying.  This postcard must have been sent before the request to send more docs and complete a full app.  What a crock!  I have one last thing to say to those people - karma's a b*tch.

Did you follow up with a wtf to the search committee member who requested the materials? I can see this happening if HR put you on the wrong list, was still sending out rejection cards for the previous year's search, etc.

I didn't.  I also thought it happened on account of <interthreaduality> incompetent HR drones.  A letter to the SC would only have confirmed that, and there's nothing to be gained by picking a fight with HR drones.  Come to think of it, even if it was the SC's fault they probably would have blamed it on HR.
Logged
polly_mer
D is for
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 14,765

Providing clues to those in need


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: November 05, 2009, 08:59:41 AM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

You newbies.  Time on the fora is never wasted.

Man, I just got depressed looking at my time logged in here: 48:20:48. At least it is a nice looking number.

49:23:50   I think I'll pick those numbers to win the Megamillions!  And, heh, I'm 1:03:02 minutes ahead of you, scampster!  Hmmmm...1, 2, 3, 23, 49, 50.   Sounds good for that Megamillions pick.

Newbies.  Sheesh.  78:17:17 and that's only logged in under this moniker.

OP, I agree that the quick phone call could go either way.  I've had long phone calls that came to nothing, not even a timely rejection letter (six months and counting for one position), and quick phone calls that led to follow-up interviews.  You just can't know.  What's in your control is getting your materials together for the next opening and let this one proceed however it will.
Logged

If you wash my car, I will give you a quarter and two bonus points on the next test.
fastelg
New member
*
Posts: 32


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2009, 01:57:37 PM »

I see nothing wrong with a three-question first-round interview. It goes something like this:

1. Why do you think that this position is a good fit for you?

2. Could you please tell us more about your research agenda?

3. As you know, the successful candidate will be responsible for teaching [the Gen Ed survey/the core methods course/grad students/whatever]. How would you approach that part of the job?

The answers to those questions (with follow-ups if/when needed) will provide plenty of information to determine whether or not I want to see a candidate on campus.

As far as the questions, those were right on.  I guess I should have known better when the SCC told me that they would call me between 11:30am and 12pm, and the SC chair gave me his cell # "In case the committee got to busy, so I could call and remind them."


Just great...
Logged
prephd
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 2,643


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2009, 08:24:50 PM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.
That's it?

Novice.
Logged

Prephd, in all that black, you are like the anti-pink-me.

Freewill is a beeyaaatch
southerntransplant
You think they'll give me tenure now that I'm a
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 2,050

Just a dipstick looking for truth.


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: November 05, 2009, 10:59:07 PM »

I've wasted twelve hours and seventeen minutes on this forum.

Interestingly, my total time is 12 days 17 hours.
Logged

"We men of science...you know." Tom Verlaine, "The Scientist Write A Letter"
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!